Talk:Grouse Mountain

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

(untitled)

See talk at Category_talk:Canadian_ski_resorts regarding Grouse's categorization as a "ski resort". Thanks! --Ds13 15:11, 2005 May 27 (UTC)

removed this line:

Information on the Grouse Grind

from the external links, because it is broken. Anyone with a correct replacement, go for it.

I've restored the link. It should be .asp, not .htm/ Pburka 00:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Grousemountain.gif

Image:Grousemountain.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Highway (North Vancouver)

Noting this:

Public access to the mountain is by a Swiss Garaventa aerial tramway, the Grouse Grind hiking trail, or the Old Grouse Mountain Highway (foot and bicycle access only).

Other than noting the road is still used by service trucks, it was actually just Mountain Highway all the way to the top, before it was gated; I'm not sure that there's a street article or would just pipe that link...Skookum1 (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's not; the bluelink Mountain Highway is to an Australian highway; so I dabbed the title above; not that it will ever need a road article but if it ever does that's the dab needed.Skookum1 (talk) 17:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed Grouse Mountain to confirm that bikes are allowed up mountain highway, but was informed that Bikes are not permitted on the private road. The lower section of the Mountain highway is used by mountain bikers, but you're not allowed to use the Mountain Highway path all the way to the top.

Openstreetmap shows where the Private section of road starts...and the private section is what made me double check the status of biking up there. 70.79.146.225 (talk) 04:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Grouse Mountain/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Still a fair number of unsourced statements/paragraphs while some existing citations are missing some parameters. A photo gallery is discouraged -- some photos should be inserted into the article and others should be removed. A trivia section is also discouraged. RedWolf (talk) 04:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 04:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 16:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Number of "steps"

2830 steps is the commonly given number and listed on Grouse Mountain's official website. An earlier page of the same site several years ago gave the number as 2380, almost certainly indicating a transposition error of one or the other. Does the current figure represent a correction from their own data sheet, or is the transposition an error that has become stuck? I suspect that that number isn't an actual step-count but a calculated figure based on the total vertical rise of the hike, because an article, 2019

https://www.burrardstreetjournal.com/grouse-grind-reopens-now-with-75-more-steps/

indicates that trail reconstruction/lengthening of that year had increased the number (not given) of steps from whatever to "5,000". This figure seems exceptionally high, for one who has hiked the grind twice; but on the other hand the vast majority of steps is on the order of 6 inches or less. There is extant a full youtube video of one complete hike, ~40 minutes. If anyone with patience wants to watch the video to count the steps the lazy way, be my guest and post it here. Who cares if it's original research? This is the only way we'll get to the truth of the matter. Even Grouse Mountain concedes in their FAQ:

"Who counted the [2830] steps?"

"We don't know!..."

JohndanR (talk) 03:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]