Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabroni

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect Job (professional wrestling) CDC (talk) 18:24, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jabroni

While it might deserve a blurb on the article for The Rock, it definitly can't stand as its own article. See WP:WIN#Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Article is no more than a definition, and any background information that was added about the word would probably not be all that encyclopedic. Also, being a derisive term, it is a potenital vandalism magnet. Lastly, the article is an orphan; the fact that no one cares enough to even link to it clearly shows that it isn't that notable.

Keep -Casito⇝Talk 05:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, slang dictionary definition. Megan1967 05:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with Megan. U$er 06:03, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge to Job (professional wrestling), where the origin of the term is already discussed. Smerdis of Tlön 14:08, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge part of it with The Rock b/c there doesn't seem to be any mention of it atm and it is a pretty famous catchphrase of his however then delete b/c well it would be kind of offensive, he's no jabroni! -- Lochaber 14:12, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
merge and Delete. --W(t) 21:21, 2005 May 27 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to job (professional wrestling), for reasons that Smerdis of Tlön already gave. As a fairly regular contributor to pro wrestling articles, I think that it would make the most sense to redirect it there. That having been said, I do think that the article for The Rock should include at least a mention of his use of that term. Dale Arnett 22:07, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redirect, and piledrive those responsible. — Phil Welch 05:43, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable. JamesBurns 10:54, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.