User talk:BesigedB

Please add a comment using this link or by clicking "edit" beside one of the sub-headers below.

Unless you ask me otherwise, I'll reply to your comment here and not on your talk page.

Commons pics

Hi from Adrian! It's an interesting question whether I need to have pity on the 56K people (I've got 2 megabit broadband from TeleWest which is eighteen times quicker than 56K). My pics straight off the camera are about 800K but I find little effect on the quality of the pic if I compress them down in Photoshop to between 300K and 350K so I'll carry on doing that.

On the subject of Commons upload , I'll do a trial. I'll upload my next five pics (all of Nissan cars) onto it and then I'll see how well it displays my image info and my copyright notice. If the user has to click on something like "Click here to see Image Information" then I probably won't do it. If I find I can still have my image info below the pic (as on en) then I will. I'll let you know - Adrian Pingstone 22:01, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Fun Fun Fun. By default the commons copyright notice isn't displayed on en:, but you can edit the page on EN to display it yourself. An example is on Image:Protest 0008.JPG - the image is on commons but I've inserted the copyright notice onto en manually. In future versions hacks like that probably won't be needed, but for now it's a fair enough workaround. --BesigedB ^(talk) 22:17, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Message

Hi! Message for you on my page - Adrian Pingstone 19:19, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

abuse

Revenge! Lan3y - Talk 23:16, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

Alls well

Hi! from Adrian. Apology happily accepted. If you don't object I'll remove all the relevant talk stuff, future generations don't need to read it! Best Wishes - Adrian Pingstone 10:00, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Galleries

Hi, just stopping to point out that on at least one occasion when converting the Wikipedia:List of images you've deleted the text from the top of the page, including the {{image}} tag! Joe D (t) 19:07, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Oh dear. I guess it's force of habit when doing big edits -> copy paste to notepad and then ctrl+a back in. I'll be more attentive next time! --BesigedB ^(talk) 20:57, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

MTR Map

I reverted originally because it displays really poorly on my browser! I'm using Safarai, and for some reason on the Airport Express link, it skips a line. It looks really awful, but I suppose I can get over it. Do you have any ideas why that might be? I would also prefer the map to be the original size, personally. Páll 21:45, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Heh, that won't do! I'll try another format and see how it looks. --BesigedB ^(talk) 22:05, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

quicklink

I am still puzzled by the idea of a quicklink. Where is this magical box into which one can type m Edinburgh and get a map? But you did point out that using templates is the important thing and rather than having a category (Articles with OSGB36 coordinates) so I have reversed my vote. -- RHaworth 13:08, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)

In Mozilla and Firefox you can set a bookmark to have an alias, so that when you type it in the URL bar you get a url. This alias can also have a parameter passed, so you can perform searches and the like. BesigedB ^(talk) 16:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:UK Wikipedians

Hi, just to let you know that the list of UK participants at the UK notice board was getting rather long, so I have replaced it with the above category which I have added to your user page. -- Francs2000 | Talk 30 June 2005 18:52 (UTC)

your "wiki" simcity

On the topic of complete irrelevance, your SimCity lacks an airport, which can bring additional commercial services to your city, as well as higher tax revenues and possibly crime. --Ted 03:20, August 12, 2005 (UTC) (reply on my talk page if you plan on responding)

If you are referring to the police chopper that hovers over the corner of either an airport, the University, country club, et cetera, I haven't quite figured that out. I know the advisor screams at you ("This locale is swarming with criminal activity. Build a police station now!"), and despite building a police station right next to it, the chopper doesn't cease. Oh well, it's a fun game. --Ted 01:43, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion: Magnetic Accelerator Cannon, Plasma Rifle, and other articles

Hey,

I've seen that you've been editing some of the Halo weapons pages. I would like to inform you that they are being nominated for deletion.

If you want to partake in the discussions, just go to their respective pages, and hit "this article's deletion entry" link.

I'll be on vacation, and will be unable to contribute to these discussions.

Cheers,

Relentless Rouge 12:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I removed your block template, as you don't appear to be blocked. If you're still having problems, visit my user page and send me an email, or replace the template. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 03:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations.

I don't expect anyone to notice or reply; but if you want to leave me a wee note below. Cheers. --BesigedB ^(talk) 15:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "no primary sources" ?

Did you take IB geography?

--Peregrine_^AY 12:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

--Peregrine_^AY 03:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's just that some of your contributions looked a lot like what's taught in the IB geo curriculum =) --Peregrine_^AY 07:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Arthur's Seat image on Edinburgh library conference page

I'm assuming it's OK to use a slightly cropped version of your image on a page with details of a digital library conference at Edinburgh? I imagine this qualifies as educational and non-commercial. Many thanks. Stevescott edin 19:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:G4tvdotcomlogo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:G4tvdotcomlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:GayTimes.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:GayTimes.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NetBSD.png

Thanks for uploading Image:NetBSD.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Macstationcairolarge1ki.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Macstationcairolarge1ki.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uftonnervetcrash.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uftonnervetcrash.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beheritmoonalbumcover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beheritmoonalbumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HK-2IFC-sj.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:HK-2IFC-sj.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maturecity.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maturecity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BesigedB. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BesigedB. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Operahouse-cropped.jpg

The file File:Operahouse-cropped.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]