Talk:Battle of Aegospotami

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Having gone back and compared with the account in Conon, and seeing different numbers in different books, I'm now completely unsure what numbers of ships to believe were there, and how many escaped. I don't have the relevant volume of Kagan, perhaps he discusses? Stan Shebs 02:18 Feb 13, 2003 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm used to twenty, and sort of assumed the smaller number referred to the ships that went to Cyprus. But checking Xenophon, he clearly states that nine ships escaped, of which only the Paralus returned to Athens. I couldn't find an explanation or primary source for the larger number, so I think we should use the smaller for the time being, and keep our eyes open for a better analysis. -- Josh Grosse

Hello

According to Battle by R.G. Grant, the Athenians had 200 ships, of which more than 190 were destroyed or captured, eight survived and of that one escaped. Tourskin

Wrong name

The area's name is Aegos potamoi not Aegospotami. These are two words. In greek is Αιγός Ποταμοί. The article should be named battle of Aegos Potami(or Potamoi). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.107.18.0 (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you are right, the spelling is mighty peculiar. Which is it, Greek -oi or Latin -i, Greek -ai or Latin -ae? And why is it rivers of just one goat? Why is it rivers when it is only one river? "Streams of the goat" it would seem to say. If you run it together into a single word then all we need worry about is the final ending and the diphthong. If it is Latinized we get Aegospotami, if not, aigospotamoi. I look back on the Internet and all I see is Aegospotami with but slight lip service given to the -oi form. But, do I find Aegospotami in the unabridged Latin dictionary? No, I do not. I do find Aegos flumen, but that is only one stream. What I suspect is some linguistic skulduggery. Some ancient name was turned into the streams of a goat by people who did not speak the original lingo. Have you ever noticed any flat bushes in Flatbush? Where are all the brooks in Brooklyn? I suggest that the traditional anglicization, which is centuries old, is good enough for us folks. So, I would not change it. This is the English WP. YOu can use the other one in the Greek WP.Dave (talk) 03:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]