Talk:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2001

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

On 15 May 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to 2001 in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The result of the discussion was Moved to Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2001.

POV/lack of citation

Either I am real dense or StarOfDavid is being real impulsive at best. His compulsion to call any and all violence against Israeli "terrorism" strikes me as very wrong, as does his treatment of BL. I have only been here for a few days, but I sincerely feel that Star deserves a warning at the very least, and possibly a temporary blocking if he does not behave. -- Luis Dantas 15:53 Feb 5, 2004

I agree completely with Luis. This article needs rewording, without the clear bias, and merging with a page to detail all the violence in the conflict, as it is most definitely a two-way story. Bias has no place on wikipedia.

Violence done in the name of a political aim, whether it is intifada, or independence of Palestine, or whatever is terrorism as opposed to someone killing another for his money, over a lover's quarrel, or just being mean. Carlossuarez46 21:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. This article stinks of massive bias. The wording wherever possible is biased. Someone change this please.

I agree, very POV page, and where are the references? why is this page up with no links or references??

Awful article, showing none of the israeli violence commited on palestenians, and exagerating palestenian violence. I guess a list of israeli terror acts would take up too much space.

I agree too, this article is biased and thus has no merit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.187.21 (talk) 10:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too. This article is totally unsourced and incredibly biased. Even the few references to Palestinian victims (even though there are, in fact, more of them) are not counted in some the monthly 'totals'. Buttockhat (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added a POV tag. Achamy (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked on "Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict 2001" and got "Violence against Israelis in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict 2001." This needs to be corrected soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.154.143 (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duplication

Hey everyone, we should just join this article with Violence in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict 2001. Keep it on both sides. Show Israeli deaths, Palestinian deaths and delete this article. I'm going to add a duplication tag to this and request that we merge cited information to the Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict 2001 Achamy (talk) 16:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DoneGreyShark (dibra) 08:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2001. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2020 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]