Talk:Egalitarianism
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Egalitarianism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Egalitarianism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Egalitarianism at the Reference desk. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Egalitarism in Soviet Bloc? You must be kidding
[edit]The references to egalitarianism and low income inequality in Soviet Union are shallow and theoretical. Official government statistics of income inequality were essentially a lie and did not reflect real situation.
The real buying power and access to goods depended on: the place you live (Moscow, Leningrad had much better access to good vs the rest of the country), your social circle and your position in quid-pro-quo economy (as a simple example, your butcher friend would give you a call when his store gets a new supply of meat, you would come through the back door and he would sell you best cuts, all this before this meat would be "thrown out" to the shelf, if at all; you would pay 2x the official price for the meat and would set him up with other favors available to you), your access and proficiency on the "black market", your access to "special" stores (such as Beryozka Stores), whether you were part of Nomenklatura, and what level did you hold. This was a world of difference: people earning the same amount of money could have 10x or more difference in real value of goods. Higher levels of Nomenklatura got their privileges "for free", as part of their package, including mansions, cars, servants. Calling this system egalitarian or "equal income" is laughable. The situation in other countries of the Soviet block was similar.
Since the in-depth discussion of the subject would deviate too far from the article subject, I suggest to remove this paragraph altogether. The topic is discussed in detail in other articles.
SashaO (talk) 23:44, 27 June 2020
Wiki Education assignment: Comparative Management Seminar
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2024 and 20 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Luca Vieten, Louisdelucy, Ulysse97190 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Louisdelucy (talk) 00:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class ethics articles
- Mid-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- B-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- B-Class Libertarianism articles
- Low-importance Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class socialism articles
- High-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles