Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stemage
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE Jinian 13:05, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I consider article Stemage vanity and its content non-encyclopedic. I originally asked for speedy delete. Author however doesn't agree because (1) it contains some facts and (2) "it's about time that Encyclopedias were humorous". Pavel Vozenilek 17:19, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, joke. Internet handles are not encyclopedic. DaveTheRed 18:14, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete--right on the borderline of speedy. But I don't quite think it makes it. Meelar (talk) 18:15, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, un-encyclopaedic, vanity. Megan1967 06:41, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, Its the coolest thing ever, why would get rid of the coolest thing ever? (unless you love hitler) 01:43, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- This was written by author of Stemage and vandal of Halo and Ico Pavel Vozenilek 19:10, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I didn't write Stemage...
- Author of Stemage is Stage Beans. The user who voted to keep the page makes mention of himself as "Red." I fail to see the difficulty in checking these things before making accusations.
- I didn't write Stemage...
- Delete, Godwin's Law. Or rather, because it's vanity and nonsense. FreplySpang (talk) 03:39, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- "Whoever points out that Godwin's law applies to the thread is also considered to have "lost" the battle, as it is considered poor form to invoke the law explicitly" And I quote, 'You Got Served.'
- d'oh. FreplySpang (talk) 03:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I have lots of jokes, too. That doesn't make me feel like throwing garbage in WP, though. Sarg 14:27, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if there's some other dude named Stemage, rename to his actual name if net handles aren't really encyclopedic, and keep for completeness' sake, even if it is a bit vain. I'm shifting a bit more towards deletion status, though. Spiritsnare 22:03, 1 Apr 2005 (PST)
This page should be kept but reworked. Internet handles are encyclopedic if that is the name by which a body effects change. Beyond the poop that flies around on this page, Stem is creating and fostering an entirely new genre of music. Porn Stars are in this enclopedia under their porn star names, Joseph Stalin is in here under the name Stalin. We should re-work it to be less glib, but what this man is doing is impressive and deserves to be documented. It is not vanity, Stem had nothing to do with it. - This comment by User:66.169.90.60.
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.