Jump to content

Talk:Who's That Girl (Madonna song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWho's That Girl (Madonna song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starWho's That Girl (Madonna song) is part of the Who's That Girl series, a good topic. It is also part of the Celebration (Madonna album) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 22, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 17, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
April 21, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

means?

[edit]

"The song was a charttoper at many international countries."

What does this sentence mean? For example, what is an "international country"?

Also, I don't think that the title should be italicized. It should be "Who's That Girl".

And is "charttoper" spelled correctly?

Alter Ego 07:14, 6 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Well as far as charttoper Im not sure but I led myself by the fact top has only one p.

it was a charttoper at many international countries, I said that to illustrate the fact it wasnt a #1 hit only in the United States, where the song was recorded.

Antonio La Puta Martin

Um .... I stoped listening? She taped him on the shoulder? He droped the glass? And I hope you don't mind what I changed. (Why "La Puta"????) Alter Ego 23:59, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Cause Im a Puta. Im a Madonna wannabe (but IM NOT SAYING SHES A PUTA , JUST IN CASE)..LOL. Changes are more than welcome as long as they benefit the page and this one did. As far as She taped him on the shoulder and the rest, well, if those are parts of the lyrics, I was explained by someone else that we can only publish part of the lyrics, so we wouldnt get sued.

Thnaks for everything and God bless!

Antonio Madonna Wannabe Martin

No, it's "tapped", not "taped" etc. Nothing to do with the lyrics. Alter I Can Do This Too Ego

Fair use rationale for Image:Madonna-Whos-That-Girl.jpg

[edit]

Image:Madonna-Whos-That-Girl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Who's That Girl (Madonna song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. I was a fan of Madonna in high school (even had a picture in my locker for a spell), but I'll try not to let my bias influence this GAR :) To save us both time, I'll make minor edits as I go along, and bring the other stuff up for discussion here. My wiki-plate is pretty full, so the review may take a few days. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 02:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've done a fairly extensive copyedit of the prose. Review the changes and revert anything you don't agree with, and also check if I've inappropriately altered the meaning. Will be back in a day or two with the actual review (and probably more copyediting). Sasata (talk) 02:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful! I checked and its fine. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, have made a few more small tweaks to the article prose. I checked out some of the online sources, and mostly everything checks out. One comment:

  • "It was also featured on the promotional-only instore video compilations It's That Girl and She's Breathless.[24][25]" These citations are to Wikipedia articles, which is to be avoided. Can you find another print or web source that says the same?
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
Prose is reasonably well written; article complies with MOS.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
    The citations to online sources I checked were fine. Citations to wiki articles need to be removed or replaced.
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Coverage is comparable to other similar song articles.
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article accurately represents the mixed critical response the song received.
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I believe the fair-use rationale to be appropriate for the two images included.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

:Pending fix to self-reference. Sasata (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Meets GA criteria, article promoted. Sasata (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Sorry for the late reply. I replaced that link with that from Andrew Metz's book. It has a list of all the videos and the tracklists. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who's that Girl Tour.

[edit]

Anyone fancy changing the description of the supposed outfit Madonna whilst singing this? The one described is the outfit she wore for the performance of 'Dress you Up', not 'Who's That Girl'. Ta. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.65.210 (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is her 'real self'?

[edit]

I have removed the sentence in the opening paragraph about Madonna being crticised for not portraying her real self in the video. For one it is unsourced and two, completely unimportant. The actual likelihood of Madonna getting crticised at that point in her career for such a tame video, bearing in mind she had received much criticism for her previous, more sexually explicit videos, is incredibly unlikely and even if it were so, hardly widespread in nature. Turdalina (talk) 23:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Who's That Girl (Madonna song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Who's That Girl (Madonna song)

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Who's That Girl (Madonna song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "MusicWeek":

  • From La Isla Bonita: Jones, Alan (August 19, 2008). "The immaculate guide to 50 years of Madonna". Music Week. Archived from the original on August 21, 2008. Retrieved July 9, 2022. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; September 11, 2008 suggested (help)
  • From Erotica (song): Jones, Alan (August 19, 2008). "The immaculate guide to 50 years of Madonna". Music Week. Archived from the original on August 21, 2008. Retrieved June 17, 2022. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; September 11, 2008 suggested (help)
  • From Like a Virgin (song): Jones, Alan (August 19, 2008). "The immaculate guide to 50 years of Madonna". Music Week. Archived from the original on August 21, 2008. Retrieved January 27, 2022. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; September 11, 2008 suggested (help)
  • From Bad Girl (Madonna song): Jones, Alan (August 19, 2008). "The immaculate guide to 50 years of Madonna". Music Week. Archived from the original on August 21, 2008. Retrieved April 12, 2022. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; September 11, 2008 suggested (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 04:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]