Talk:List of Anglo-Saxon monarchs and kingdoms

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Heptarchy
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Heptarchy

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms High‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The article should probably be called Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms or perhaps pre-unification kingdoms so Celtic parts can be included? Stan Shebs 07:59 Feb 14, 2003 (UTC)

Our naming conventions would ask for either Anglo-Saxon kingdom (if it has text about the kingdoms in general) or List of Anglo-Saxon kingdoms (if it's nothing but a list). (List of) Pre-unification kingdom(s) wouldn't be very good, since it needs something to indicate the location. -- Toby 20:23 Feb 20, 2003 (UTC)

I would think this article (or a sister article under some similar title) should include discussion about the nature and powers of monarchy in the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, and the various provisions for the succession (hereditary or elected, how often were there usurpers, etc.). Shulgi 16:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

This article seems just to be a list of kings etc, which can be included in the heptarchy article, and doesn't have much reason to stand independent. Sadads (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]