Jump to content

Talk:Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleArchery at the 2004 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Acronym usage

[edit]
64 archers took part in the Olympics, with each NOC being able to enter a maximum of three archers.

What is an NOC? I'm guessing it's roughly equivalent to "country", but the article doesn't say, and it ought to really. --Camembert

National Olympic Committee when referring to sport normally but you can never guarantee what the writer meant. Could be Never Opinionated Christian or Normally Outlandish Cuckoo?? Scraggy4 00:30, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Expanded the acronym. - Jonel 02:38, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Thanks both. Good article, by the way :) --Camembert
[edit]

If you check this section of the official website, you will see that when you place the arrow over the pictogram, the text says that they are property of the ATHOC (ATHens Organizing Committee). Is there any cause for this to be considered fair use? As a matter of fact, there are quite a few articles on olympic events displaying the respective pictograms, it would appear that all of them will have to be removed. Redux 05:14, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Four arrow shootoff

[edit]

The official website is slightly misleading in the result of Sobieraj vs Thin in the womens round of 64. The tie-break went 9-9, 8-8, 8-8 but a fourth arrow was required as the third arrows were too close to call even after measuring the distance to the center/ Sobieraj then won 9-7 on the fourth arrow, see [1] (polish) Matthewmayer 10:05, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    In the Qualification and format section, it would be best if "National Olympic Committees (NOC's)" were mentioned once, so you don't have to repeat using "National Olympic Committees" and instead just add (NOC). The links for "Hiroshi Yamamoto" and "Laurence Godfrey" need to be fixed.
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    In the lead, "Without surprise", sounds like POV.
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If the above statements can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like LAX did my dirty work, so thanks to him! I think everything is in order now. Thanks again! Jared (t)  15:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you to LAX for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Archery_at_the_2004_Summer_Olympics&oldid=1205301387"