User talk:Laonoodlekeemow

Heroes/Isaac's power

While I understand what you were attempting to convey, the fact is that 'aid' means helps but can be done without, and 'induced' means brought on the event. We've had this issue before on the page. Some editors are anti-drug, and have let that color their editing on the matter. Other editors cite Peter Petrelli's ability to paint the future without drug use. Both have been put behidn us. The consensus, time after time is that until Isaac paints WITHOUT the drugs, he NEEDS the drugs. His own statements support this. Rely on HIS statements over those of his kidnapper/'helpers'. That said, please keep working on the page. Just be prepared for minor reversions. ThuranX 03:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-etiquette

Finally, as a note of etiquette, do NOT edit another User's USER PAGE, only his/her TALK PAGE. ThuranX 03:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Placing a space between words should hardly be a hanging offence... laonoodlekeemow 03:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more note: One, it's not a big deal, I didn't revert it, so don't worry. second, I recommend you re-instate the welcome message yu were left. That text includes links to a number of wikipolicies and wikiguidelines. Those will probably be quite useful in you developing a strong wiki-editing 'career'. ThuranX 03:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read those post before I ever signed up for an account. But, thanks you for your concern. laonoodlekeemow 03:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem possessed of an exceedingly short patience. I made QUITE clear the positions of the editors on the page as related to Isaac's powers. If you took the time to look through the talk page topics, and the archives, you'd see that the position, as I explained it, is one that we've come to over LONG LONG debate. For you to engage in tendentious editing in the hopes of getting your way while being at best, prickly, and at worst, actually incivil, is not a recommended course of action. Please, go read the talk page. Look in the archives. There is a great deal of discussion there about this issue. Until such time as Isaac himself demonstrates his ability sans drugs, it should stay 'drug-induced'. That's the consensus, reached by long discussion. Either engage in the discussion, and present some reasons why, or accept that your edit will be reverted out. ThuranX 04:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the archives and there hardly seems to be any conclusive agreement. Any objective assesment would conclude that 'aided' is more easily demonstrated than 'induced' this coupled with the text of the most recent episode seem enough to include 'aided' over 'induced.' Furthermore, why would a charcter's statements about their abilities be considered the most gospel of statements? laonoodlekeemow 04:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Especially when that character is a junkie. WookMuff 10:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: whiney editors

hehe some people, man, i tell ya. Aid vs Induce, but they get into such a tizzy. Try explaining definitions and they will just power on by without understanding. Not to be insulting to any editors, my word no. Just... you know... commiserating :) WookMuff 10:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, nice. That's not only incivility, but a personal attack. Don't let the continued conversation on the talk page get in the way of a PA. ThuranX 02:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What? A personal attack would surely include some kind of naming of the person being attacked. Where in WP:CIVIL does it say that commiserating with an editor about a certain kind of editor, not even naming names, who do something disagreeable, is uncivil? also, "It should be noted that some editors deliberately push others to the point of breaching civility, without committing such a breach themselves." hmm, curious. WookMuff 05:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Children of Men

The term "fugees", in this context, is the correct term for "refugees", in both the book, the script, and the film. It was explained earlier in the text and is used appropriately. This has nothing to do with hip-hop. —Viriditas | Talk 10:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Lightning Bolt Live Photo, by Ren.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lightning Bolt Live Photo, by Ren.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 23:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(replying to message on my talk page) — Since the time that you uploaded that photo, our policies changed to no longer allow "Wikipedia use only" licenses. This is because we want people to be able to copy and modify Wikipedia content as they see fit. To keep this file, you should contact the copyright holder of the photo and ask them to release the photo under a general license such as the CC-BY-SA-2.5. Ask them to send a statement to the effect of "I authorize the redistribution of http://laserbeast.com/photos/brookbolt5.jpg under the terms of the CC-BY-SA-2.5" to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org. If they agree, also send an e-mail to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org explaining that the permission is for Image:Lightning Bolt Live Photo, by Ren.jpg. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sunny Day Real Estate - Diary.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunny Day Real Estate - Diary.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunny Day Real Estate - Diary.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunny Day Real Estate - Diary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hella - Hold Your Horse Is.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hella - Hold Your Horse Is.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The White Hoods

The article The White Hoods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources whatsoever

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mucube (talk • contribs) 18:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]