User talk:Modargo

Hello Modargo and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Deism - Moved from User page

I have – for the time being – protected the article on Deism. Please discuss any changes you want to make with other interested parties at Talk:Deism instead of continually reverting each other. Thank you. (CC also to the other party in this revert war.) Lupo 14:26, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) (Sorry for having posted this first in the wrong place.)

Renominations to VfD

At Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Proposed new rule: No repeat submission of articles, you raised the concern that the poll was not well structured for people's actual votes. I've proposed a revote in a different format. I'd appreciate your comments and changes before people start really using the table. Rossami 14:48, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

A warm welcome and a friendly inquiry

Many warm and sincere salutations!!! Are you a new editor that recently joined the community? If so, I bid you welcome.

I was about to add the Episode 21 and 22 English titles and add in the Episode 20 synopsis here tonight when I noticed your handiwork. There is not much that I can complain about it except for a few spelling errors and that contractions detract from the ambiance of Wikipedia being an encyclopedia which I have already corrected; still, I am at a loss for the reasoning behind the revisions that were made for the first eleven episodes. The Revision History documents the great pains I have taken to keep all the episode synopses quite brief and I am at a loss for what objection anybody could raise. I would like for you to please leave a message on my talk page to discuss the matter.

Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 04:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commendation and Confession

It seems that you have been quite active here over the course of June 4, Modargo. Along with an exhortation to please keep up the good work is a confession that the vocabulary that you saw used in the episode synopses I wrote reflects the fact that I used to as a kid and occasionally still read the dictionary for fun.

There is another Wikipedia editor that seems rather hostile and unaccommodating over what is simply normal operation for me ever since I joined the Wikipedia community . . . I do hope those sentiments of his cool down somewhat so that he and I can harmoniously work alongside each other. While I did learn to not be so pedantic with my episode synopses, it seems that these efforts are not enough. Perhaps I am overlooking something crucial . . .

Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 15:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swans (magazine)

Dear Modargo, I hope now it's better... Swans is cited also on important articles on human rights, or on britannica.com. Regards, --Egonon (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also on the Oxford University Press it's cited Swans as reliable source; Polish professor Marek Glogoczowski cites an article of Swans as "the best summary of George Soros humanitarian activities in South-East Europe"; the editor/essayist Gilles d'Aimery is cited by reliable essays, for example of ÁD Rodríguez, or Jörg Becker (who cites also Swans); and many contributors of Swans are relevant. (I added these notes also on the "talk" of the article.) Regards, --Egonon (talk) 10:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Swans is remembered also by Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung --Egonon (talk) 22:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added other references, on the article and on the talk; I think now it's possible to remove the tag, and now I'm removing it, but if you repute it's still necessary, add it again :) Regards --Egonon (talk) 17:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:APT logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:APT logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tripetrol

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tripetrol, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fdizile (developer) 18:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tripetrol

The article Tripetrol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, possible claim to significance but no claim to notability. I can not find significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GB fan 00:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]