User talk:Zondor

Forum (education)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Forum (education), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

Reason given is : Fail to see how this is different from forum (legal) in which schools are mentioned and it is unlikely to be expanded. Sufficient explanation in Wiktionary [1]. If you remove the prod please give me an explanation why you think the article should be kept. Thankyou. Firelement85 15:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Controversies

I've posted some questions about the category at [[talk: Category:Controversies]]. Your input would be appreciated. -Will Beback 18:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BitTorrent

{{helpme}} is just for use on your own talk page (here), not on various Wikipedia talk pages. If you want a good answer to your factual question I recommend the Reference desk - you are sure to get an answer there.--Commander Keane 07:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary words

Zondor, got a second to elaborate on what you are trying to accomplish with articles such as Before and Afterwards? We are obviously not a dictionary, and I can't think of why somone would research the encylopedia for a word like Before. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 07:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's for the reply, I was about to Speedy Delete these, but you're obviously not a clueless newbie :) Although I still don't see much use for these, if you do then someone else may as well, could you go easy on creating more of these for a day or so to make sure there's not a slew of afd/csd noms or issues brought up from your VP link? Thanks, xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 07:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving items to Wiktionary

Can you please review what you recently moved to Wiktionary? By moving them, do you mean that you believe each of them passes wikt:Wiktionary:Criteria_for_inclusion? Otherwise you might just be dumping garbage to another wiki. --Perfecto 09:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then please stop. If any of them are inappropriate, then an admin there, not just an ordinary user, has to come delete the entry you made. I mean, you're spreading the bad. --Perfecto 09:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. See its Deletion log.

WP:AFL

Was wondering if you'd be interested in having a look at WikiProject AFL. You an Aussie rules fan? If so I'd strongly suggest you accept the invitation. Cheers, R o gerthat ^Talk 12:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[2] -- Zondor 13:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. :D Just that your username sounded familiar - I know an aussie rules fan who uses that nickname, just thought it might be you. R o gerthat ^Talk 08:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ambi

I note there have been some suggestions re Ambi's real life persona. I would suggest that pursuing it against Ambi's wishes is harrassment. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second Garglebutt's comment. Please leave her alone. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[3] -- Zondor 07:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Garglebutt has plenty of things to think about in terms of harrassment. But I think putting up that blog link is probably not good. --2006BC 07:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(after ec) I hope you realise that blog is most likely written by the Stephen Beng Ho vandal who wrote defamatory content about Rizzuto and accused Ambi, Longhair and myself of being the same person. As if Ambi would annouce it on a public blog if she was Rizzuto. That blog is just another fake Rizutto site. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I correct myself. It isn't another fake site. It's the same one. This is the Australian politics vandal User talk:StephenBengHo. You'll notice that Longhair cites a blog which StephenBengHo kept inserting into the now deleted Rizzuto article. Funnily enough it's the exact same site that you're now citing as proof that Ambi is Rizzuto. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, even if I was Paula Rizzuto, that blog is utterly defamatory, and your linking to it would be unwise. And secondly, I am not Paula Rizzuto, as I just proved to Adam Carr by posting logged out from my Canberra IP address. Thirdly, edit my user page again in that manner and I will block you. Ambi 23:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[4] -- Zondor 05:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You vandalised my userpage. This is grounds for blocking, thus this will occur if it happens again. Ambi 05:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is just as unwise concluding it is vandalism. [5] You're totally out of touch with community standards here, Zondor. Editing a contributor's user page to disclose their identity is vandalism of the most serious nature. Editing a contributor's user page to imply a false identity is just petty vandalism. Where or not you believe Ambi to be Paula Rizzuto, your edit of Ambi's user page was vandalism, and if you do it again there will be admins lining up to save Ambi the trouble of blocking you. Snottygobble 06:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[6] -- Zondor 06:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're confusing the article space with user pages. Garglebutt / (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You only have the right to invoke Ignore all rules when you obey the spirit of Wikipedia i.e. Don't be a dick. By the letter of the law or the spirit of the law, your vandalism of Ambi's user page is unacceptable. Snottygobble 11:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Snottygobble and Ambi. You made a comment on Ambi's talkpage, asking: "is that a threat?". It was a threat, and the only reason why you should not take good notice of it is because, if you act inappropriately towards Ambi — or any other Australian editor — again, I intend to block you before she even knows about it. Is that understood? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are all very good at sticking out for each other. I am powerless against the mob. -- Zondor 15:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. You did something very stupid, and a bunch of admins noticed it, and made sure you realised it was very stupid. Now, relax. You haven't actually been blocked for your act of vandalism, have you? Take your medicine, and wake up on the other side of bed tomorrow morning. We'll do the same. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The entries you moved to Wiktionary

No one is trying to verify the entries you copied to Wiktionary and tagged because they're angry at you. Almost every one of them will be deleted, it looks like.

You have a responsibility to (1) clean up the unformatted mess you made with your so-called "Wikipedia dumps" and to (2) try to verify the entries that you nominated for verification. I don't know whether you were trying to get the entries deleted by acting the way you did--I hope not.

Sincerely,

Primetime 14:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[7] -- Zondor 14:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

leet

i have reverted the change you made to the leet disambiguation page. i invite you to have a look at talk:leet (language) for the... uproar that has come from that very change (language or not). presently, there are at least three sources verifying that it is considered a language (or meets the criteria therein). if you have something new to add to the discussion, please do so there. thanks, ... aa:talk 04:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eat one's own dog food

I removed the (incomplete) See Also links you made to Don't Be Evil and Eat one's own dog food. I don't see how Google's ethical policy has anything to do with this phrase about a company using the products it makes. --mtz206 12:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your photos of SD Meetup

Hi Zondor, I hope you are well. I've not talked to you in quite some time. You took photos (Image:San_Diego_Meetup_with_Jimbo_1.JPG and Image:San Diego Meetup with Jimbo 2.JPG) at the San Diego meetup. Do you know most of the attendees usernames? I thought it would be nice to add that to the photo descriptions. Could you help with that, please? I don't want to mislable anyone due to a faulty memory connection. Thanks! Johntex\^talk 02:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[8] -- Zondor 03:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry - my mistake. Thanks anyway, Johntex\^talk 03:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated "stable version"

I see you've recreated the "forked" version of Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr.. Unless I've missed some development on this score, this is not an operational process, and is still against Wikipedia:Content forking -- though at least it's no longer out of line with WP:PROTECT. Given the established consensus to delete this, it would seem to be speediable. Alai 06:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[9] -- Zondor 07:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow. Can you address the above with regard to why it shouldn't be speedily deleted, as a recreation of deleted material, and as a content fork? Alai 07:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[10] -- Zondor 07:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One deleteable article at a time, please. This is a WP:CSD G4; do you agree, and if not, why not? Alai 08:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[11] -- Zondor 08:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I call 100% agreement to delete a pretty good consensus, actually. If there's no-one advocating it be kept at all, then "turnout" may be somewhat diminished. Given how actually stable the main article is, I don't see why you can't do "stable review" on a separate talk page, and put any changes into the history of said main article, as I suggested previously.

I'm not holding my breath for there being 10,000 "stable articles", if it takes this long to agree a stable version of a featured article, of which there are <1000. IMO you need both software support of stable version marking, and a more "lightweight" and speedy review process, otherwise the idea's not really going anywhere. Certainly 10,000 forked articles, all of them duplicating entries in permanent categories, isn't going to be acceptable. Alai 15:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[12] -- Zondor 02:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've no objection at all to forks on the basis you suggest; that sounds like a good plan. Perhaps on the model of featured article nominations, there could be a "stabilisation window" (of 7, 10, 14 days, or whatever), after which it'd be put into the main history as a stable version if there's consensus to do so, at which point the copy would be deleted. (Obviously this could be extended if there's still active work on stablising.) One additional thing I'd request: turn the categories into links while they're on the forked page, so the copy isn't separately categorised under its "odd" name. Alai 02:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain type of copyright

Dear Zondor

Does the copyright described below allowme to use one of BMAG's images in a Wikipeda article and if so what category of right is to be quoted if I upload an image from the BMAG website?

Copyright All intellectual property of Birmingham Museums & Art Gallery such as trademarks, trade names, patents, registered designs and any other automatic intellectual property rights derived from the aesthetics or functionality of the Website remain the property of Birmingham Museums & Art Gallery.

By using the Website you agree to respect the intellectual property rights of Birmingham Museums & Art Gallery and will refrain from copying, downloading, transmitting, reproducing, printing, or exploiting for commercial purpose any material contained within the Website.

Thanks Sibadd 08:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[13] -- Zondor 09:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Root Page concept

Hi, I note that you defended Wikipedia:Root page in the past to some extent. The idea is now under attack despite months of effort my myself and User:Light current and numerous changes that overcome objections. We think we now have a very neat system in action, using special templates, which you can see in action in several places. Would you please take a look and consider supporting us by voting to keep at the link given on Wikipedia talk:Root page --Lindosland 17:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

gardening

You visited Albert Wilson. Might you form a view on the likely COPYVIO there - see talk page? Midgley 17:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians

Why did you strike User:168... on Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians? He/she still hasn't contributed in 2 years. And why did you add a 2 year old diff? --rogerd 12:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This should be reverted. Maybe I thought it said 2006? I can't do it now because my IP rather than my user account is blocked. [14] -- Zondor 12:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Julianne.Moore.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Julianne.Moore.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Hi, sorry we can't use photo agency images. 20:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Your toolbox

Hi Zondor, I had picked up the useful toolbox that you have on your page and pasted it to my homepage. Once there, I tried tweaking it a bit to suit my needs. However, when I checked your page, the changes had been made there as well... So I reverted the changes... Obviously I am a bit technologically challenged. Can you advise how I can make changes to the one on my userpage without affecting the one on yours. Thanks Lost 05:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2005 Belgian urban violence

Hi, I've nominated 2005 Belgian urban violence for deletion : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Belgian urban violence (second nomination). I thought you might be interested. --LucVerhelst 21:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Bad Things

...is now in your userspace. See TfD. Cheers, Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 00:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your "Columnisations"

I noticed you reformatted quite a few articles by creating multiple columns in certain sections.

While this may work in some cases, in others it actually makes the content a lot harder to read. And, unless I've lost track at some point, it is also against the styling guidelines of Wikipedia. See: Wikipedia:Guide to layout and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

So, please don't go overboard with those columns, and, especially on popular articles, check what other people think about the reformatting before you apply them (since it does go against the guidelines). Thanks! --Frescard 06:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[15] -- Zondor 12:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linked Aussie map

I think the map you added is an improvement to the earlier version. (I don't know what others will think though) It is too big though in my opinion. can reduce its width by maybe 30%??? It sticks out too much at the moment. --Merbabu 04:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, nice work Zondor. I made some further comments in Talk:Australia --Merbabu 05:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The map has been returned to the article. However, there is unsightly text bleed. Could you please add a margin to it (say of 1em or more)? Thanks--cj | talk 11:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative divisions of England

neat map labelling! Morwen - Talk 10:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT shortcuts

I figured out a way to do shortcuts. WP:CSD has id anchors for each criteria (like WP:CSD#G4). So I just did that using <span id> tags. Now each section has a shortcut. —Mitaphane _talk 22:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

clickable maps

Hi Zondor thats a fantastic program you have there for adding labels to maps! I tried making a couple of my own for sports (NFL, NBA, MLB ) but cant get them to sit in the article without braking the text, wonder if you know how to do this? --Astrokey44 10:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[16] -- Zondor 07:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup in planning

Hello, you've indicated that you're interested in future Meetups in Melbourne on this list, so I'm giving you this message to remind you that Melbounre meetup number four is currently in planning. If you haven't already, please go to Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne to suggest possible dates, times and locations. Thanks --Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I, Zzyzx11, award you this barnstar for adding clickable maps to various articles. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"X Label[l]ed Map"s

Hi Zondor,
Just become aware these via here and, as it looks as though you're their originator/facilitator – if so, thanks for great idea/work! – I wondered if you'd agree that the templates listed in the documentation might benefit from a rename to a

[{LabelledMap X}}

format (or the like), i.e. akin to the Infobox templates...? If so, is there somewhere I ought to post this suggestion to test for any consensus...? Thanks, David Kernow (talk) 01:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup

Greetings, person who is listed as being interested in future meetups in Melbourne. The fourth meetup will be held on 18 December, at Lower House in Fed Square (in the Alfred Deaking building, Flinders Street end near the Atrium: map), starting from 7pm. We don't currently have a separate location for discussion beforehand, but there'll be plenty of time to talk wiki over dinner. --bainer (talk) 14:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about Lee Isaacs

Keep Isaacs is my vote. This photographer is quite notable. Editor Hoary decided long ago he didn't want Isaacs' on WP for whatever reason. We both obviously see, along with others, that Isaacs work is as notable as half of the photographers on WP whether its art photography and/or commercial photography. I fleshed out alot of this article but I do understand to google Lee Isaacs is not easy since alot of people have his first and last name as a middle name and last name. I have a book here, UPsouth, that has many examples of his work. This is a Warhol project grant through Space One Eleven. He is in good company as far as the notoriety of the other artists here is concerned. Emma Amos and bell hooks are in the book along with Willie Cole and Marie Weaver. Cole is the only other male in this project. Maybe someone could sift through some of this. Artsojourner 06:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Drop.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Drop.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Drop.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Drop.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Hang.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Hang.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Ready.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Ready.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Wound.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam Hussein - Hanging - Wound.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Labelled Image Editor

Is there any to get a Labelled Image Editor that'll run on a Mac? My Java's up to date, but I get errors whenever I try to launch it. Is there something I can do to get it to run? --Cody.Pope 18:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fifth Melbourne meetup

The fifth meetup of Melbourne Wikipedians is being planned as a breakfast meeting in the city with Jimbo Wales (at a venue to be arranged) on Friday, 27 April 2007.

Jimbo has proposed breakfast as the one real window of opportunity during his tightly scheduled stay in Melbourne. Tbe precise time has to be sorted out with Jimbo, but the arrangements for the equivalent Adelaide meetup a few days before may give a good idea.

Feel free to edit the relevant page in any way that might be helpful. I feel like a bit of an interloper, not having attended previous meetups. If there's anything you can do to help, I'll be grateful. Please think about whether you'll be able to make it, assuming the arrangements are similar to those Adelaide is adopting (i.e. a block of time with people being fairly free to arrive when it suits them). Some indication on the page of your possible participation would be really helpful. Metamagician3000 06:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sample-national-park-service-pictographs.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sample-national-park-service-pictographs.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 15:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sample-national-park-service-pictographs.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Sample-national-park-service-pictographs.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 15:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[17] -- Zondor 05:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fair use

I have requested a review of the Image:Cisco.Certified.Network.Associate.Logo.png file that you uploaded (back in 2004), because I am less than 100% sure the image qualifies as fair use. Although it is of low-resolution, and is used solely to illustrate the subject matter in Wikipedia, it does not really contribute to the public's understanding of the subject matter, and so I think that it safely may be able to be deleted.

You and I may agree that it's fair use, but I nominated the image for review on the Wikipedia:possibly unfree images page, and possible deletion, out of an abundance of caution. If you work for Cisco then please go ahead and delete my nomination from the "possibly unfree images" page. 69.140.164.142 07:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CompTIA.A.Plus.Logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CompTIA.A.Plus.Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CompTIA.A.Plus.Logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CompTIA.A.Plus.Logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Blogger.Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blogger.Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CompTIA.A.Plus.Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:CompTIA.A.Plus.Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Microsoft.Certified.Professional.Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Microsoft.Certified.Professional.Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Labelled Map - England Counties

I have created a labelled map showing Ceremonial counties of England. It can be found at Template:England_Counties_Labelled_Map. Just wondered if you wanted to add it into your User:Zondor/Labelled Map Documentation template list.

Thanks.
Java13690 17:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Infosys.InStep.Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Infosys.InStep.Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 08:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peru Labelled Map

please tell me how to use this, I have installed the Jaaruntimeenv but I don't know how to run the .jar file. --Andersmusician $ 04:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The.Big.Lebowski.1998.Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The.Big.Lebowski.1998.Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 10:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lake baikal

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lake baikal, by Bkell, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lake baikal fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

No pages link here, and the MediaWiki software will correct the capitalization if "lake baikal" is entered into the search box

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lake baikal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Lake baikal itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rediff.com.Logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rediff.com.Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:IMDb.Logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:IMDb.Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The.Big.Lebowski.1998.Screenshot.2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The.Big.Lebowski.1998.Screenshot.2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup 6

Hi. This is a reminder to people on the Melbourne meetup participation list that the next meetup has been arranged for 19 June. Could you indicate on the meetup page your likely attendence, or otherwise. Regards. - Cuddy Wifter 23:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:IMDb.Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IMDb.Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Suprnova.org.Logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Suprnova.org.Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prestige final scene

Zondor, thanks for your interest in The Prestige article. Take a close look at the DVD release and you'll see that there is no live Angier in the background. That's why your contribution was removed.
Jim Dunning | talk 14:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Orkut.Logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orkut.Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Labelled Maps with Rotation

Hi Zondor,

That's a great job you have done on map labeling! I was just wondering that whether or not it is possible to add a rotation to the text. It would be awesome then! Then one can label everything, for example, I was thinking of labeling street maps where labels are along the streets; or, as another example, if one wants to label something which is very horizontally-narrow, like Chile in South America map, right? Imagine in this map, the name Chile was something else, like Trinidad and Tobago... :)

Have fun,

S I A M A X 22:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[18] -- Zondor 00:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

labelled Maps for arabic wikipedia

hi zondor,

your work is awsome. i really appreciate it. and I need your help to make your work really useful for arabic version of wikipedia. the problem i am facing is when use your application and paste the code into arabic wikipedia by default the picture going to be on the right side of the page (see example here [19]) unlike the english wikipedia and this cause me alot of work to fix that. is there are any easier way to fix this problem. Thanx in advance . --AhmadEn 01:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A wonderful idea

You have created probably the most needed template of all Wikipedia-{{editprotected}}--Angel David 01:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lanarkshire and Ayrshire Railway Map

Not sure what you point now is as the negative scaling has been removed. The map is 780px wide and all the positional co-ordinates are below this figure. Can you help me with an example of what the issue is? --Stewart^(talk) 16:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[20] -- Zondor 16:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[21] --Stewart^(talk) 17:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[22] -- Zondor 17:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Meetup

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hello! The Melburnians are having another meet-up! Please consult this page if you are interested to participate in the discussion! Thanks! Phgao 03:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jacuzzi-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacuzzi-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shimizu Mega-City Pyramid/video

A tag has been placed on Shimizu Mega-City Pyramid/video, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 13:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating subpages with only links to YouTube videos, as they are inappropriate. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Realestate-com-au-sydney-regions.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Realestate-com-au-sydney-regions.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Wikipedia videos/Sky City 1000

A tag has been placed on Template:Wikipedia videos/Sky City 1000 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Template:Wikipedia videos/Sky City 1000|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Africa Labelled Map

A tag has been placed on Template:Africa Labelled Map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ({{transclusionless}}).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Infosys logo sml.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Infosys logo sml.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black people talk comment

{{uw-ra|Talk:Black people}} Your comment has been removed also. ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 17:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Chile Labelled Map

A tag has been placed on Template:Chile Labelled Map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ({{transclusionless}}).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Infosys logo sml.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Infosys logo sml.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qnext

A tag has been placed on Qnext, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Qnext and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orange Mike | Talk 16:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VMware.Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:VMware.Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I want someone to make a TOC(Tables of content) template for wikipedia like this[23]. If you know how to make, then please put on your effort as it will be good for wikipedia and its users. *The image is an edited one*. I didn't find any template that would break or split the contents into half and put the other half on right side[24]. This template will utilize the blank space and will make the contents table easily accessible without scrolling down. THANKS. Harryroger (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Image:Scotch regions.svg/labelled

Image:Scotch regions.svg/labelled, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Image:Scotch regions.svg/labelled.

Bottom line, this looks like it should be in template space like your others...

Looks like an early work-around you turned into a whole system...

Have you given any thought to internationalizing those templates and/or making them available on the commons? FrankB 19:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Labelled image map templates

Hi. I saw your name at the end of the "Labelled Map" documentation, so thought this may be of interest. Sardanaphalus (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Caucasus Labelled Map

A tag has been placed on Template:Caucasus Labelled Map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ({{transclusionless}}).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wp:citation needed

Hi Zondor,

Can I persuade you to get rid of the external links section at the bottom of this page? My favorite part about this page is that it's one of the briefest in the WP: space. As the editor who included the XKCD comic on the page in the first place (August 15, check the edit history), believe me, I'm with you, I think the inclusion of the XKCD is a fabulous thing. But the external links section adds almost 25% more text to the length of the page. And the thing is, the link to Digg doesn't say anything except, haha, pointing out that there's an XKCD comic on the page! -- which we already know.

I would be greatly, greatly, appreciative if you could be persuaded on this one. I have put dozens and dozens of hours into rewriting this page to be as brief as possible, and it would mean a lot to me.

thanks. Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 14:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The.Big.Lebowski.1998.Screenshot.1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The.Big.Lebowski.1998.Screenshot.1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 20:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Meetup

2009

Sunday, October 11, in St. Paul.
R.S.V.P. here.

Please share this with anyone who may be interested.

Jonathunder (talk) 23:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One ball

Hi, I am unsure, have you added that to the hitler article as a joke? Off2riorob (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Apatin Labelled Map

You had tagged Template:Apatin Labelled Map for cleanup. Do you remember why? RJFJR (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of "discuss" template to various articles

You have recently added {{discuss}} and/or {{discusshl}} to numerous articles without explanation. Most of your additions have been reversed, making your edits pointless. Could you please explain why you are adding these templates and what you hope to achieve? Many editors would like to know. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was pretty self explanatory. Its an extension of the {{discuss}} tag. Its like using a yellow marker and writing notes about it, and so its very Web 2.0. Its useful in conjunction with the new Beta interface with Ajax popups of the content of the discussion. Wikipedia has an inherent problem of being untrustworthy in which these tags would hopefully help to resolve. The yellow highlights are suppose to highlight problems with some statements, if I had not done that correctly. Wikipedia is too proud of itself to think it is a worthy source of information. If you don't like them, then remove them only when the problem/discussion has been resolved. -- Zondor (talk) 13:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been adding them to parts of the text that have already been resolved—whether England is a country or not has been asked dozens of times and the resulting answer is yes; see the FAQ on the article's talk page. If you have a problem with the content, discuss it; don't just spam the article with templates and move to the next one. The yellow marker is quite ugly and distracting for the reader—the ones who are not involved with editing and simply want to read the content. Hayden120 (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My copyediting is trying to facilitate discussion. I would say these highlights are better than the boilerplates at being less conspicuous. It's a small price to pay to alert the reader that what they read might be false. -- Zondor (talk) 14:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions are forcing action in many cases where no discussion is required because it's already happened and ended, sometimes long ago. There is simply no point adding the tags in these cases. You need to ensure that discussion is required before adding these tags or else the edits are not constructive. A single generic question on a talk page, such as this, is insufficient justification for interrupting articles with an "in your face" template. Perhaps you would be better off engaging in the discussion on the talk page first, rather than trying to mandate one with your template. Above all, you need to explain why you are adding the template with an edit summary, if you think the addition is justified. --AussieLegend (talk) 14:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I have not correctly utilised the {{discusshl}}/{{discuss}} properly, but note that {{discuss}} is rather stable and well accepted. For some articles, I had simply replaced {{discuss}} with the new {{discusshl}}, but they were reverted too by another user. You just don't like the yellow, don't you? -- Zondor (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rediff.com.Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Rediff.com.Logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rediff.com.Logo.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Rediff.com.Logo.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chile Labelled Map

Template:Chile Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Tahash Timeline

Please look at the article Tahash, and on the Discussion Page: "Consensus on Timeline" give your opinion about the Timeline. Thank you. --Michael Paul Heart (talk) 13:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup this Saturday

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)[reply]

Deletion request

"User talk pages should not be speedy deleted by admins." Please submit a request at MfD. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 19:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Orders of magnitude (length)

Template:Orders of magnitude (length) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adam Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baldwin brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Zondor! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newgrounds

Yo. I'm not 100% convinced that this was a good addition. The news sources don't really talk about his connection to NG, and being memorialized by Fulp on the site itself aside, his actions weren't an event that really shaped the site as a whole in the 20 years it's been around. I don't think it's within the scope. ^BLUSTER⌉⌊_BLASTER 11:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lost cluster

The article Lost cluster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP is not a dictionary or technical guide

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Col-begin

Template:Col-begin has been nominated for merging with Template:Multicol. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Dvorapa (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zondor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zondor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Agência Brasil images has been nominated for discussion

Category:Agência Brasil images, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avenue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Africa Labelled Map

Template:Africa Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydney Urban Areas Labelled Map

Template:Sydney Urban Areas Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonejackal (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zondor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of General-Director

Hello Zondor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged General-Director for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-Finlayson (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jacuzzi-logo.png

The file File:Jacuzzi-logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Catchphrases and Category:Slogans have been nominated for discussion

Category:Catchphrases has been nominated for merger into Category:Slogans (one or the other of which you created). A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 10:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Making a sub-category

Hi, Zondor. I wanted to ask you if there was a special way to designate a category (such as "Category:Palestine ethnographers") as a sub-category of the parent category, "Category:Palestinologists"? If so, can you do this for us?Davidbena (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Speedy deletion nomination of Yo Mama (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yo Mama (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Input/output base address

The article Input/output base address has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

trivia with no inherent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adobe JRun

The article Adobe JRun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]