User talk:Davidcannon

Welcome!

NOTE (24 January 2007) - all of our discussions before 1 January 2015 have now been archived. Previous archives: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008-2014

* AWB Archive - where all conversations concerning AWB have been moved.

Welcome to my talk page! You are very welcome to comment on any articles that I have authored or edited, or just to pop in and say Hello. Whenever I think this page gets too long, older conversations will be moved to my archive page.

Please post your comments below:

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plymouth Brethren, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Muller and King of Israel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for letting me know! I'll get around to fixing that! David Cannon (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Open Brethren

added links pointing to Evangelist and King of Israel

Plymouth Brethren

added a link pointing to Evangelist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Gospel Hall Brethren

Hi Davidcannon, Re. your recent posts on the Gospel Hall Brethren page. I note from your history that you are a brethren buff! Do you have the expertise to absorb the Gospel Hall Brethren page into the Open Brethren page? I have long contended that it should be a sectrion of that page, and doesn't warrant a page of its own. Journalist492 (talk) 14:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

• Difficult question! The Gospel Halls do have some distinctives that set them apart from their fellow-Brethren, especially in North America (less so in other parts of the world, however). If it can never be much more than a stub, perhaps it should be merged into the Open Brethren article. On the other hand, the OB article itself is quite long, so I really don't know what to think. I personally prefer articles not to be too short (like GHB) or too long (as OB might get), but that's just my own preference — we have to find a consensus on Wikipedia. For now, I'd rather let the matter ventilate for a while and let others have their say. Perhaps we can then collectively make up our minds what to do with the GHB article. David Cannon (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kerala Brethren, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TMM and Gudalur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jone Baledrokadroka

The article Jone Baledrokadroka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J04n(talk page) 14:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

• Okay, it's a deal:-) David Cannon (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Gounder

It may very well be a fact, but it not a defining characteristic of him, and is presently uncited. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

• Okay, give me time and I'll find a source. The template (which I had nothing to do with making) has a "religion" field for a reason. A person's religion may not be a "defining characteristic" but can (sometimes partially) explain what informs his world-view. Nothing uniquely Hindu about that - Bush held Evangelical Christian views which influenced him, Erdogan (in Turkey) is influenced by his Muslim faith (or at least his own interpretation thereof). Not a defining characteristic, but relevant. BTW, last time I looked at Bush's page, the infobox listed him as "Methodist." Why? After all, it's not a defining characteristic, is it? Anyway, if Gounder is removed from the Hindu cat, so must every other politician listed there. If you go on such a deletion spree, you won't have me to deal with, you'll have a whole lot of editors who won't be happy about that kind of mucking around. Not something to squabble over - I'll look for sources, I promise. (I've been mostly absent from Wikipedia for about 8 years and find a lot of loose ends to attend to on returning, so please give me a bit of time). BTW, I'm putting this reply on both my talk page and yours. David Cannon (talk) 08:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Adminship

Thanks - I'd be willing to consider it, provided I can set a time limit for myself of one year, maybe two. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

• Great! Actually, time limits are not all that important, as any admin can withdraw at any time. I'll put your name forward sometime this weekend. David Cannon (talk) 13:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Just letting you know you have not completed the nomination nor transcluded it on the main RFA page. Please read Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nominate. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Trout

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. You seem to have accidentally removed others comments on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ser Amantio di Nicolao Winner 42 Talk to me! 03:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your user page is cascade protected.

Please do not cascade protect your user page. This makes templates that are usually not protected like {{User ko-1}} and {{User eo-2}} protected as well. Even {{User Ten Year Society}} became protected because you enabled cascade protection for your user page.  Template editors will be unable to make changes on {{Age in years, months and days}}, {{Award2}}, and {{ISO 639 name}} unless the cascade protection for your user page is turned off. Cascade protection causes all templates that are transcluded in a page to be protected. Eyesnore (pc) 00:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't realize that. I'll undo the cascade protection when I get home (I'm not supposed to be on Wikipedia when I'm at work). David Cannon (talk) 07:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lami, Fiji page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Adminship

Never did thank you properly for nominating me. It's going to be an adventure, that's for sure. It will be an honor to serve, and I hope that I may do justice to the faith you have placed in me.

Thanks again! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

You are more than welcome! I'm so glad to have you on board. Welcome to the club! David Cannon (talk) 06:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Adminship Nomination for Rich Farmbrough

Hi David, Greetings! I saw that you have nominated Rich for adminship. Could you direct me to the page as I would like to contribute. I accidentally went onto the 2005 discussion by following the link on his talkpage. Thank you for your help in advance. Audit Guy (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

David, please rest assured that I am not downhearted by the responses at RFA, of which 90%+ are totally reasonable, and a goodly proportion even of the opposes are morally supportive. I was to some extent paralysed by the question of whether to consider an RFA or an ABRCOM appeal first - if indeed I wanted to do either. Your action broke that deadlock.

Let me also encourage and support you in continuing to nominate candidates for adminship in the future.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:47, 29 June 2015 (UTC).

Thank you, Rich :-) David Cannon (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bau (village)

added a link pointing to Soso

Nairai

added a link pointing to Lomaiviti

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Daniel Rae Costello

Hello mate, could you restore this article which i created in late 2006/early 2007? Since you are familiar with Fijian people, you know he is very notable, the deleting admin didn't even bother to read the article before he deleted it (as per his comments on IRC) and now refuses to restore it...Thanks--Stemoc 02:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• I'll have a look. Could you tell me who deleted it — and direct me to the discussion where he refused to restore it? David Cannon (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
• The problem is lack of citations. All biographies of living persons created since 2010 must contain at least one citation to a credible external source. If you can provide me with some (or if I can find at least one), I'll restore the article for you. David Cannon (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Rjd0060, apparently it was PRODed and deleted on June 20th, but I only found out now while looking through another article related to a fijian musician ...the discussion took place on wikipedia-en's IRC ..yeah i created it so many years back so not that many info online but it was sourced enough, you can use his official Itunes page or an article on him last year on the samoan observer--Stemoc 02:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I've restored the page for you and added a couple of citations. :-)

Alliance Party (Fiji)

Hi David. I see you moved this article to Alliance Party. I'm afraid I have moved it back to the (Fiji) title, as I don't believe it is the primary topic for the name. The Alliance Party was the ruling party in Malaysia for 16 years, whilst the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland is currently one of the main parties in Northern Ireland. If you still think it is the primary topic, I'd suggest you use the RM process. Cheers, Number 57 11:00, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

• Okay then. Thanks for letting me know:-) David Cannon (talk) 11:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Ex Administrator with a break and surprised

Hello Davidcannon,

What a surprise, when someone pointed me to your proposal while I was doing a similar proposal

I'm also around for 11+ years on fr.wiki and also was very surprised by the how wikipedia looks like slow, which with respect to 2004-2008, looks more like completely frozen.

I'm also surprised by the role the administrator took and the posture they have

Would you be interested in contributing to another proposal ?

Xmlizer (talk) 22:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

• Sure. Have you got anything in writing? I'd like to have a look at it:-) David Cannon (talk) 01:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

it's in french so far, but as soon as I translate it I ping you Xmlizer (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! David Cannon (talk) 10:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mahendra Chaudhry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of the 2000 Fijian coup d'état|Mutinies]], and [Aftermath of the 2000 Fijian coup d'état|Aftermath]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Index of Fiji-related articles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Union (Fiji)]] - [[National Democratic Party (Fiji, 1960s)|National Democratic Party (1960s)]] - [[National Democratic Party (Fiji, 2006)|National Democratic Party (2006) - [[National Federation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:15, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A. D. Patel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial Sugar Refining Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

My thanks

David, thanks for some of your recent comments regarding the state adminship standards have risen to in your absence. We need more users like you to try to convince others to go back to giving the benefit of the doubt. (A discussion between Risker and myself on my talk page touches on this topic.) –xeno^talk 01:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Country topics

Hi there — your recent edits to Template:Country topics seem to have broken the template.

I'm not fluent in template-ese, but it seems to be on the "name" line near the top. After the words "topics", there were two closing curly-braces — }} — and you changed it to only one. This is now making some templates that uses Country topics just display "{{Navbox with striping |name = European Union topics}" — I noticed it on Template:European Union topics. Thanks for any help you can give. Woodshed (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

FYI/update, another user fixed it in responde to my helpdesk query. Woodshed (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

That was me. The template is used in 14458 pages. Please preview and carefully check edits to high-use templates. I often get brackets wrong, also in simple edits where it seems unlikely to mess up, but I catch it with previews, sometimes using "Preview page with this template" at the bottom of template edit windows. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

I apologise. Thank you for your advice - I'll take it. I thought the template needed to be fixed, as it was pointing to a redirect (a page that got moved a couple of years ago). I'm sorry I put my foot in it - I should have tested my changes to make sure they were working. David Cannon (talk) 07:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reconciliation, Tolerance, and Unity Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Hughes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maca Likutabua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Taito

Re your edit and comment here: At the time the article was written, "Fiji Islander" was the official demonym for a citizen of Fiji; it was not a "pc weasel word", as you put it. Today, calling someone "Fiji Islander" rather than "Fijian" would indeed have a right-wing political connotation, but it's simply that the article was never updated. Kindly refrain from assuming ill intent…
That having been said, thank you for your various updates to articles about Fiji. For a few years, I felt a little bit alone in writing or updating articles about Fiji politics (and sometimes sports or other areas). (And thank you again for all the tireless mass of work you did on Fiji in the first place a few years ago!) Aridd (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for pointing that out, Aridd. You are right — I didn't realize the contributor was you (and I really respect you for your contribution to the Fiji project), and I jumped to conclusions too hastily about what might have motivated whoever wrote that. Yes, it's true, the abrogated 1997 constitution defined all Fiji citizens as Fiji Islanders. I was away for a long time, and sometimes I just don't realize how long some articles have gone without being updated. I apologise for my hasty reaction and will endeavour to be more careful in future. David Cannon (talk) 11:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Fiji

Thanks for the invite! I added my name to the project page. I do some Wiki Clean up from time to time and I'd been running into a lot of Fiji-related articles. I'll add whatever info I can find. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

bilateral relations articles

The case of Bangladesh Fiji may be notable but it is wrong to say all relations articles are notable. Hundreds have been deleted which demonstrates no inherent notability. In any case I now agree with your removal of the notability tag on the Bangladesh Fiji article. LibStar (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

• Okay then. I'll be more careful in future about automatically assuming notability for diplomatic articles. David Cannon (talk) 12:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Suva Grammar School

Can I ask for your assistance on this one. Seems like those obsessed with the rugby achievements of former students have taken over the article. LibStar (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

• I agree, it does look rather unbalanced. Rugby is a huge thing in Fiji, but even so, it makes it look as if that's primarily what the school is known for - NOT a very balanced view at all. I'll try to find out a bit about the school and its history, academic achievements, etc., to even the article up. David Cannon (talk) 12:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

thanks, I understand it's actually one of the top academic schools in Fiji. LibStar (talk) 14:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

RFC posted

See Wikipedia talk:Redirect#RFC: Should users be permitted/encouraged to change links via redirects to piped links or direct links?. I have tried to be completely neutral in the opening statement. Feel free to make any arguments for change, or to post any views, particularly if they are in any way different from those already posted (which are linked in the RFC and so need not be repeated at length). Sorry it took a bit of time. DES ^(talk) 11:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you DES. I'll keep an eye on the discussion and chip in from time to time :-) David Cannon (talk) 12:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of islands of Fiji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ba, Fiji. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Chief Justice of Fiji

Hi, you recently tagged Chief Justice of Fiji, with an edit summary like "needs updating as per 2013 constitution". You may be Wikipedia's top expert on the Fijian Constitution (I am certainly not), so please and go ahead and fix the article yourself (with references) if you are privy to this information. If not, could you please expand the nature of your query at Talk:Chief Justice of Fiji. If you are just complaining about the political situation in Fiji, please remove the tag. Thanks, >MinorProphet (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your thoughtful tagging of the article. I haven't been keeping with the news recently, too much editing. An all-too-brief search for Fiji in the news turned up nothing (I was probably too specific in my search), hence my unfortunately brusque message. Sorry, I was falling asleep at the time. >MinorProphet (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

That's okay:-) The reason I tagged the article is that Fiji has undergone great changes since 2006. A new constitution — with which I am not very familiar — has been written. It MAY have redefined the role of the Chief Justice — or it may not have. That's something I will look into, but it may take some time. In the meantime, I was hoping that perhaps some other editor might know more than I do and save me the trouble. But never mind ... David Cannon (talk) 02:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Infobox title dispute with another user

Hello. I have recently entered a dispute with Cartakes over the correct naming of former countries (specifically the old imperial dynasties of China) in the top of the article infobox. As it was originally (and I have attempted once to revert this to no avail), the names were simply the period names such as "Sui", "Xia", "Tang" (and on occasion "Great Yuan", "Great Qing", etc.) which are the official state names from the period. However, he has come along and changed them to include the word "dynasty" with the period name in the infobox title which is not the official state name but a common name given by Western culture. I have attempted to talk to him, but he is adamant that I am incorrect. Even looking at the same articles written in Chinese show that the infobox title without the word "dynasty" in it. Our discussion is located in this section on his talk page. Can you please help me resolve this? Nick Mitchell 98 (talk) 13:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

• I'll have a look. I am not very familiar with this topic, but will try to go by policy. It might be a good idea to bring the matter up on the talk page(s) of the relevant article(s), and on the project page, if there is one, and allow other users to have their say. But I'll have a look for you:-) David Cannon (talk) 13:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Indo-Fijian Hindus

You do realise that that the above mentioned Category is very racist right? ..There is no such thing as an ITaukei hindus so the category was better as Fijian Hindus and there was no need to divide it..the term "indo-fijian" is no longer allowed to be used under the 2013 Constitution.--Stemoc 04:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry, it's not meant to be racist. Actually, what I'm trying to do is rationalize the Fijian categories, which has to be done consistently. No such thing as iTaukei Hindus — you may be surprised to know that the 2007 census showed a small number of iTaukei converts to Hinduism (several hundred). Admittedly none of them have articles on Wikipedia as yet, but it's at least theoretically possible that there will be some, and the category system should make room for that. Following our neutral point of view, Wikipedia shouldn't be into making a judgement about whether there is ever likely / unlikely to be a need for it.

The category system needs to be consistent, too. For example, the Category:Indo-Fijian Muslims and Category:Indo-Fijian Christians categories will link to international — and India-specific categories about Muslims and Christians (I haven't put the links in yet. I will later — unless somebody else beats me to it). The Category:Indo-Fijian Hindus category will likewise link to international and India-specific categories concerning Hinduism. Keeping it the way it was created a problem : Category:Fijian Hindus itself was a sub-category of Category:Fijian people by religion. This includes other categories that have nothing to do with Indians, so when linked to India-specific categories, that would muddle things up.

I'm uncomfortable with the emotional and political connotations that are so often attached to words like Indo-Fijian. I have Indian friends who have argued vehemently both for and against that term, and other terms. It's not my business to take sides in that debate, and Wikipedia should stick to a neutral point of view and avoid taking sides either. That's partly why I renamed the parent category from Category:Indo-Fijian people to Category:Fijian people of Indian descent (which is also consistent with the way other categories are named — e.g. Category:British people of Indian descent. Wikipedia is trying to rationalize its naming systems for categories, so I'm just trying to follow the system that international categories have. (I had nothing to do with setting that system up, by the way). As for using the term "Indo-Fijian" in other categories, once again I'm just trying to follow the practice of how other categories (specific to other countries) are named. As it stands, the Category:Fijian Hindus category has not been deleted: it still stands as an empty category, but as the parent category it will be an important link to international categories. Just so that you know, what I've done with the category is not a split, it's a diffusion.

I'm also in the process of organizing categories for iTaukei people. Those categories will be inside parent categories that will also include categories related to Indians. NO WAY is this intended as a social/political statement! It's simply so that researchers will be able to access information through streamlined categories — the Indo-Fijian categories will link to global categories about Indian people, the iTaukei categories to global categories about Melanesian /Oceanian people, and both sets of categories to parent categories about Fijian people generally.

Bottom line: these categories are not just about Indians in Fiji. They have to be organized in such a way as to be able to "link" to categories about INDIAN people globally (Hindus, Muslims, Christians, etc), WITHOUT conflating those international categories with topics that have nothing to do with Indians. I will try to find out a bit more about how this is being done project-wide and will follow that pattern. David Cannon (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Lagi Dyer

No |reliable source to verify information about a living person? Therefore no content. GiantSnowman

• Okay, I'll let you have it your way until I find sources. I'm VERY sure of this, but you are right, I do need to find sources - and I will. David Cannon (talk) 12:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Morrison, 2nd Viscount Dunrossil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Elizabeth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teu Ó hAilpín, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork, Ireland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Roscoe C. Martin

No longer an orphan. Feel free to help me find more references. He might be the same academic who taught at Syracuse, but so far I can't find an obituary or career summary, despite his achievements.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

• Great! If it's no longer an orphan, please remove the "Orphan" tag, if you haven't done so already. Also, I'll have a look tomorrow to try to find some sources for you! Cheers. David Cannon (talk) 11:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

I have found some and expanded it. I'll remove the 'under construction' tag later today, as it's become a respectable start.Zigzig20s (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Question

I see you have put some  nbsp marks in Russian locomotive class TE2. I'm sure you have a reason for this but could you please tell me what they are for? Biscuittin (talk) 13:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

• NBSP stands for "No-break space." In HTML, the language Web pages are created with, a space is read the same as two, ten, or one hundred spaces. So if you want to put more than one space between two words or two objects on a Web page, you need to use a no-break space. David Cannon (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

That's useful, but why put it before kW? Biscuittin (talk) 15:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

To ensure that a linebreak does not occur within the string "736 kW", making it harder to read. Maproom (talk) 07:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

I see. Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Civilian casualties in the war in Afghanistan (2001–present) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The Article About the Village of Musabeyli

You added that the article that i have created doesnt fit the notability guidelines,but i want to correct you. From Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines for Geographical Locations: Populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable.

It is a populated place in Turkey,so it counts as notable.It is also legally recognized as a village in Turkey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.119.57 (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC) Oh sorry,i forgot to log in. KaptaşHero (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

• I see; thank you for correcting me. The tag I added doesn't necessarily mean that the subject isn't notable, only that it may not be. It is meant (a) to alert the creator and any other interested editors to take a second look (which I'm glad you've done), and (b) if necessary, add citations that will validate its notability, or, if it already has that, remove the tag. It's not meant to be a "deletion warrant" for the article, only a head-up that it may be necessary to fill in a few details. It appears that I tagged this one in error, so I'm happy for you to remove the tag:-) David Cannon (talk) 00:09, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ye Ri Kim page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy delete

You add your comments to pages awaiting for speedy delete, see e.g. Sterling Linder Davis, Gary Striewski.Xx236 (talk) 09:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

• Okay then, should I just delete such articles instead? Or should I leave them alone? David Cannon (talk) 09:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • I believe they should be deleted, if everything runs according to the rules. Xx236 (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Okay then, I'll get rid of them. David Cannon (talk) 09:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Gary striewski.Xx236 (talk) 09:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

If you judge that they ought to be deleted under the relevant criterion, you may surely delete them. If you think that no speedy deletion is warranted, you may remove the db tag. I generally then add {{oldcsd}} to the talk page, and sometimes drop a note on the talk page of the editor who tagged the article or page for speedy deletion. In such a case you might well choose to edit the article or page. If you aren't sure but wish to try to improve a page, or leave a talk page comment for another admin, that is also perfectly fine. There is nothing wrong with leaving comments on such pages, if you judge them worth leaving. However I don't think there is much point in adding maintenance tags to a page tagged with db-author, unless you are going to decline the speedy (generally because there is in fact more than one author) DES ^(talk) 13:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice, DES. I ended up deleting the three articles, as the request came from the author personally. But I won't always do that automatically — I'll read each article as it comes. Thanks again for your advice — it's very helpful. David Cannon (talk) 13:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Territory of New Guinea page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Very nice

Wow! It is great to see you editing here once again. One of my original true fiends in Wikipedia. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

• Hello Tony! Yes, it's great to be back! And it's even greater to see that YOU are still going strong! David Cannon (talk) 05:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • By the way my friend, I want to share with you some of the scenes of a PBS documentary which will be televised on Sept. 22, and in which I participated. Click on "watch", I'm the guy with the white cap: http://ontwofrontsmovie.com/ Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
    • Wow Tony, that is SO interesting! Thank you so much, Marine 69-71 for sharing this documentary with me! I was only a small child when these events took place, but I well remember my parents and just about everybody else talking about them. The Latino perspective is one that is not well known, and I hope the sacrifices made by Latinos will get a much better hearing as a result of this documentary. Once again, thank you so much for sharing it. David Cannon (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

José Manuel Imbamba

Dearest Davidcannon, thank you to help me in correcting this page.

May I ask your help also in the future? Thanks a lot and have a nice Sunday!

Rei Momo (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

• By all means! Wikipedia is a collaborative project and we're all here to help one another. Don't hesitate to ask me at any time — if it's something I know about I'll help you, and if not, I'll try to find somebody who can. You have a great Sunday too! David Cannon (talk) 11:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Christopher Stafford Stanley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	With compliments! Mootros (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you SO much, Mootros! It's very much appreciated! David Cannon (talk) 12:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 1 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tahiti at the 2015 Pacific Games page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Telangana State Symbols

Telangana State Symbols has been blanked by the author, so the template should be db-author rather than multiple issues. Xx236 (talk) 06:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Big Race

I don't accept you opinion it were a stub, so I demand speedy deletion.Xx236 (talk) 07:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

• Done. But in future, please ask politely. Throwing your weight around with "demands" only creates a tense environment in which we're all trying to get along. The reason why I tagged it rather than deleting it is that I'd rather make the mistake of "passing" an article that shouldn't be there, than delete one that should be. The article was written in a rather stupid way, but for all i knew, there could be a book with that title and the article could, perhaps, have been turned into something better by someone in the know. David Cannon (talk) 07:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry about my language, I'm not a native speaker. I meant that I demanded in general, not from you. Xx236 (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I see. All good then :-) David Cannon (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

I see you've been going through articles I started. I just wanted to drop by and say thank you. I'm grateful. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you so much Anna Frodesiak, for all your kind words! You've put a smile on my face to go to sleep with :-) David Cannon (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I try to always give credit when credit is due. You do good work here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

About Johnson_Philip

I notice that you have put together an article about me. However, there are a few factual errors, and kindly correct it.

1. It says I am "Principal of Brethren Theological College at Cochin University". Actually it should be Cochin University PO, where PO stands for Post Office. Alternately, you can drop the name Cochin University and say "Principal of Brethren Theological College in Kerala". BTC has no connection with Cochin University.

2. The article says that I lean towards Arminianism. That is wrong. I am opposed both to strict Calvinism as well as to strict Arminianism, and stand midway to accept some tenets of Calvinism and some of Arminianism.

3. In Academic career "he became the Founding Principal of Brethren Theological College at Cochin University in Kerala.[23]" the phrase Cochin University should be changed to 'Kerala'

I guess that Cochin University PO confuses many who do not know the meaning of PO

I will mention other corrections after these two major errors are corrected

Dr. Johnson C. Philip (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you so much, Dr. Johnson C. Philip, for bringing to my attention inaccuracies in your biography. Wikipedia aims for accuracy, and by drawing attention to errors you are doing us a great service. I did try to write an accurate article, Dr Philip, synthesizing information found from numerous sources, but obviously there are things that I misinterpreted. For that I apologise, and will make the necessary connections forthwith. I also look forward to your other corrections. David Cannon (talk) 15:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
  • P.S. I've now made some (minimal) edits to your biography. I'm still not sure whether the paragraph on Calvinism/Arminianism accurately reflects your views; if not, please advise me further! Moreover, I've added this statement (based on your communication above): "Philip states that he stands mid-way between Calvinism and Arminianism, accepting some tenets of both theological systems." I'm wondering whether you can direct me to a published source (either online or in print) in which your mid-way position is set out. I ask this because everything in Wikipedia is supposed to be verifiable and linked to reliable sources. I've put the statement in anyway, but I'd love to have a source so that it cannot be challenged. Once again, I look forward to hearing what other corrections need to be made. David Cannon (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
    • Dear David, thank you very much for the correction you made. Now it reflects things more accurately. As to my midway stand on Calvinism/Arminianism, I will send some citation very soon. Thanks for this article on me. Till today I was unaware of its existence. God bless you! Dr. Johnson C. Philip (talk) 16:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to French battleship Richelieu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of the {{convert|380|mm|in|abbr=on}} shell was originally provided.{{sfn|Jordan|Dumas|2001|p=102}})

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Hugh Dowding, 1st Baron Dowding page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Joan Bartlett page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Chicago-style politics (meme) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chicago-style politics (meme) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago-style politics (meme) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Springee (talk) 19:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

need information about marjah operation

Need information about marjah operation I was linguist in helmand USA marine corps. Hasamudin (talk) 13:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Sir . I was USA marine corps A company 2nd light armored reconnaissance battalion linguist in Afghanistan helmand province since 2010/1/14 in marjah operation. Sir now I need my supervisor name and address. My nane .hasamudin sherzai AFG # 9798 my email address . Hasamudinsherzai1@gmail.com my phone NO . 0093776773401

Hasamudin (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry, I don't have that kind of information. Good luck. David Cannon (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bloke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Attorneys General of the Leeward Islands

Hi David- I will have a good look to see if anything worthwhile can be done on the above, but I can give a few more names from an initial google search viz.

• c.1711 Thomas Bretton
• c.1790 John Stanley
• c.1810 John Burke
• c.1820 Paul Horsford

The political history of Leeward Islands is very messy. They seem to have appeared in several incarnations over the centuries, by and large between 1671 and 1960. But I like this sort of challenge and will put a stub together over the next few days. Maybe others can then add to it. RegardsPlucas58 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I'll look forward to it. Initially, anything is better than nothing! David Cannon (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Udal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Society of Antiquaries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Josu4u. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, W. A. G. Young, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Josu4u (talk) 11:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

• Huh? I've only just created the page — splitting it off from another article. I'm still in the process of formatting it. I'm not sure what you're talking about, but thanks for letting me know anyway :-) David Cannon (talk) 11:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Well done on noticing that extraneous }} _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks — those braces and brackets can drive me mad at times! David Cannon (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Lucky he wasn't as busy as the duke of Wellington eh! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

You bet! David Cannon (talk) 12:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ashley Greenwood

added links pointing to Tyrol and Registrar

Charles Gough Howell

added a link pointing to Loos

Edward Enoch Jenkins

added a link pointing to Zomba

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for all the spelling fixes. I will try harder to proof my writing. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• You're welcome, Anna! That's what the wiki idea is for — everybody pitches in to contribute, clean up, etc. We're all here to help one another. Thank you for your kind words and encouragement. David Cannon (talk) 13:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

paraphrase

hi dear friend. could you please paraphrase; "It provides the young child with an introduction to books and the Peter Rabbit universe." thanks more info [1] Alborzagros (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Alborzagros! How about this : "It introduces children to books and to the world of Peter Rabbit." Have a great day! David Cannon (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

thank you dude. Alborzagros (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia

Hi David, your edit to that article didn't fix a typo at all because of the word "there" after "based, so I've undone the major part of it (while keeping the AWB fixes). Graham87 14:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you Graham. Another problem with the article, which I don't know how to fix, is the cite error (citation number 8). I've been coming across quite a few of these —I tried fixing a couple of them and made a bigger mess than ever, so I'm leaving them alone for now. But perhaps you could fix that one for me (assuming you know how), and I'll watch and learn how it is done. Thanks :-) David Cannon (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
  • I've fixed that one by updating the URL and compacting the ref. The old URL also had brackets in it, which could have been changed to %5B and %5C to make it work, but that wasn't necessary. (P.s. I didn't get your notification because you notified the user with the username Graham, instead of me, Graham87. I only got this message because I noticed your message on the RFA talk page, and wondered why the talk link in your signature had been marked as visited on my computer). Graham87 12:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you Graham87. I'll have a look at what you've done and learn from it! David Cannon (talk) 12:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sculpture by the Sea page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

• • Fixed. David Cannon (talk) 08:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

any idea?

youre brave editing indonesian arts - there more errors in there than you or any other ed has had breakfasts

at category 1920's in Dutch East Indies there is a rather false set of red link dates 1950s to 2000's

the coding is for the template; EstcatCountryDecade|19|2|20th|the Dutch East Indies|Dutch East Indies

any idea how to get it to stop at the 40s or does it stay regardless...

JarrahTree 11:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

• I'll have a look. I fix errors if I know (or think I know) how to do it — and if I'm not absolutely sure I've done it right, if flag it as "test edit — check" or as ; (NB — check this edit!). Some I just don't know — and I hit the skip button. I'll have a look at this one for you — but I'll try to fix it ONLY if I know how. Wish me luck! David Cannon (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
  • JarrahTree —I'm not sure whether I've just got the wrong link (it is this one : Category:1920s in the Dutch East Indies? — Or whether it's my browser, but I cannot see any red links. David Cannon (talk) 11:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Apologies, I have lost the category page, I had found it and it must have been something like decades. I am about to leave computer for a while for a cup of tea, will try to get back to it, please ignore this any further at the moment. Will write my issue off as had it but lost it, in more ways than one. Thanks for your responses. cheers JarrahTree 11:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Never found it - but very impressed by your consistent effort through Indonesian articles, thank you. JarrahTree 11:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

You're most welcome! I'm only scratching the surface — not even that. Many Indonesian articles are appallingly formatted. As I said, I'm only fixing what I know how to do — I've been belted in the eye too many times for mistakes I've made, so I have to be cautious about what I do. Still, if I do a little, and everybody else does a little, the job will get done. David Cannon (talk) 11:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Request for adminship

Hi David,

How are you doing? Firstly, I want to thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia. The community is very proud of you. I observed that several admin backlogs need more attention and i like to help in this area. I will be more than glad if you can nominate me for the mob at request for adminship. With kind regards, Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

• Hi! I'll have a look at your contributions later today when I get home from work, and if all goes well, I'll be happy to nominate you:-) David Cannon (talk) 00:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Fiji Football League

Hi Daniel, my name is Lawrence and I have seen that you have an extremely keen interest for Fiji. If you are interested, I have a new task force proposal as part of the Wikipedia Football page about Oceania football. Your help would be highly appreciated as you have some more in depth of Fiji and I also spotted you making a small edit to a page on the Port Vila Football League in August (hence how I found you). If you would like to explore this avenue a bit further, your help would be beneficial on other football league pages in need of help in the Oceania region. Lawrencedepe (talk) 19:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for inviting me! I'm happy to have a look, and will help out where I can :-) David Cannon (talk) 01:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi David,

I want to appreciate your support and immense contributions in that thread. I appreciate the confidence you have in me and I'm deeply sorry to disappoint you. It has never occurred to me that my user page could be used against me among other concerns although some irrelevant issues where raised but I will take them as constructive criticisms. I won't allow that to discourage me and I will continue my good work here. Hope I can reach out to you for assistance in the future? With kind regards, Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

• You're welcome, Wikicology. RFA can be a rough place, and I've noticed that quite a few people who hang out there tend to assume bad faith, especially for first-time applicants. Yes, please do continue your good work on Wikipedia, and I'll be happy to nominate you again at a later time. Kind regards, David Cannon (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kelemedi Bulewa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fijian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Assuming bad faith

Hi. I'm one of those pile-on opposers at RfA that assumes bad faith. I think you bear some responsibility for that train wreck of an RfA. Your candidate lacks cluefullness and has created an edit history which clearly other editors balk at. I question your judgment in that you thought he was an appropriate RfA candidate. The fact that you didn't know how to transclude the nom doesn't impress me, either. Advancing the idea that the community should support adminship for an editor simply because he's a lecturer at a university is utter nonsense and you should know better. However, your own RfA was in a different era and perhaps you're not cognizant that the average expectations have changed. Please take my comments to heart. We as a community depend on the competence of our admins. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

• Okay, Chris troutman, I'll take note. You are right; my own RFA was indeed in a different era. That was an era where we generally were more than willing to give one another the benefit of the doubt. I also recall that in 2005-2006 or so, we had about 50-60 RFA's a month. I took a long break from Wikipedia; apart from a handful of brief appearances, I was away for about 8 years. When I came back this year, I found that the RFA system had become a lot more cut-throat (from my point of view). Perhaps that is why the number of admins has hardly changed since 2007 — even though the number of articles has increased 5-fold. I must admit that I liked it a lot better the old way. However, your point is taken. I DO accept the need for competence, and will bear that in mind in future. David Cannon (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

David, I think you are an extraordinarily nice person. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Anna. Your kindness and encouragement mean a great deal to me. David Cannon (talk) 01:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Queensland horses

Hi David, concerning to your article about Queenslander houses in Australia, there is one question: Is there any connection to India in the development of this type of Architekturen? Mans thanks Hajo hjduroi@gmx.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.47.67 (talk) 17:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

• Hmm. Not too sure about that one! I'll try to look into it for you:-) David Cannon (talk) 09:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Question about adminship

I saw you were listed as someone who was willing to consider nominating candidates for adminship. I would like to know if you felt I would be worthy of a nomination, when you have a chance, and if not, where you feel I could improve to be a better candidate. Being a user and editor of Wikipedia for close to 10 years (with a few breaks thrown in), I feel that I would have a lot to offer as admin, namely patience, a level head, and the ability to help resolve conflict when needed. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

• I'm more than willing to have a look at your work, Wildthing61476 and nominate you if all looks well. But in the interests of full disclosure, it's been only a few days since I got roundly criticized for making a nomination that I thought was suitable — but many of the others didn't. Like you, I've been part of Wikipedia for a long time (since 2004, in fact), but was mostly away from 2007 until recently. In the meantime, the culture of the project has changed, and I'm still trying to familiarize myself with the way things stand now. What the community expects of admins has changed too, apparently. As I said, I'll have a look at your work, and most probably be eager to nominate you. But I fear that it's a bit too soon after that last fiasco for me to safely nominate anybody — people will jump to conclusions about me being the nominator, and vote oppose. So the options are these: Either wait a month or two, and then let me nominate you, or find somebody else to nominate you now, and I'll vote for you. How about that?David Cannon (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  • No use in rushing to be honest, I'd be happy to wait a bit, besides it might give me more time to help strengthen my case that I would be a solid administrator. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
    • Okay then :-) I'll nominate you in a couple of months. If I forget, please remind me! I've taken a look at some of your work, and I'm really impressed. You're definitely an asset to this project.David Cannon (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
      • Thank you for the compliment, if I don't forget I'll send a reminder in the beginning of 2016, unless I'm nominated prior to then. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from the top

Thank you kindly. Not much time to rest on my laurels, but I think I'll have me a little nap for the next couple of days. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Teodoro Andal Agoncillo

Teodoro Andal Agoncillo was born on November 9, 1912, not October 9.

Keesing's

Hi Davidcannon, you should have received an email from me regarding your request for access to Keesing's - could you please either complete the form linked from that email or email me if you did not receive it? Nikkimaria (talk) 13:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Ditto for Newspaperarchive.com. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Ditto JSTOR. Note that for that one in particular, since there are more applicants than there are accounts, not responding will result in someone else being assigned your slot. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Nikkimaria. Thank you for alerting me. My apologies, I lost all your (and everybody's) emails in a computer accident recently. I deleted everything by mistake. Please send me the form again — especially for Keesings and Newspaperarchive. Jstor will be useful to me later on, but is not such a high priority at the moment, so I don't mind if you let somebody else have a go in the meantime. But the other two, yes, I'm very keen. I'll resend this message via e-mail in case this fails to reach you. Thanks! David Cannon (talk) 02:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

• Okay, I've re-sent the Newspaperarchive and Keesing's emails. Per your comment here I'm going to strike your JSTOR approval - feel free to reapply later if it will be more helpful then. Were there any other TWL resources you applied to that you're now missing emails for? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Dash correction

Your recent edit summaries read "replaced hyphen with m-dash" when what you have actually (and correctly) done is to replace a hyphen by an n-dash. It would be helpful if you can indicate this correctly in future. Thanks! Peter coxhead (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Peter! Thank you for the heads-up. I was mistaken —I thought "n-dash" was just another name for "hyphen" and that "m-dash" was what you've just told me is "n-dash". Thanks to you, I'll get that right from now on :-) By the way, are you the same Peter Coxhead I know from church and Facebook, by any chance? David Cannon (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Not the same Peter Coxhead, as I live in the UK. However, I know from some research into my family history that although "Coxhead" is a very rare surname in the UK, it is much more common in New Zealand. We are all probably distantly related. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert E. Kelley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

$ symbols and maths

Hi, I just reverted your edit here. In mathematics articles, the $ usually denotes LaTeX code, and you changed correct code to incorrect code. Please check whether "0$" has something to do with money before changing it into anything else. (In the context of the article, the $ needed to be changed into <math> tags, not moving around). Best wishes, —Kusma (t·c) 11:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you. I was unaware that the dollar sign has that coding significance. I believe I have made one other edit like that —I will find it and revert myself. Thanks! David Cannon (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Signpost exit poll

Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?

  If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.

  All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian

The questionnaire

Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.

quick and easy exit poll , estimated time required: 4 minutes

Q#0. Will you be responding to the questions in this exit poll? Why or why not? Your Answer: Your Comments: Q#1. Arbs must have at least 0k / 2k / 4k / 8k / 16k / 32k+ edits to Wikipedia. Your Numeric Answer: Your Comments: Q#2. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years editing Wikipedia. Your Numeric Answer: Your Comments: Q#3. Arbs... A: should not be an admin B: should preferably not be an admin C: can be but need not be an admin D: should preferably be an admin E: must be or have been an admin F: must currently be an admin Your Single-Letter Answer: Your Comments: Q#4. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years of experience as an admin. Your Numeric Answer: Your Comments: Q#5. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you support this year, and why? Your List-Of-Usernames You Supported: Your Comments: The Quick&Easy End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion. Your Wikipedia Username: General Comments:

the extended exit poll, estimated time required: depends

Q#6. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you oppose this year, and why? Your List-Of-Usernames You Opposed: Your Comments: Q#7. Are there any Wikipedians you would like to see run for ArbCom, in the December 2016 election, twelve months from now? Who? Your List-Of-Usernames As Potential Future Candidates: Your Comments: Q#8. Why did you vote in the 2015 ArbCom elections? In particular, how did you learn about the election, and what motivated you to participate this year? Your Answer: Your Comments: Q#9. For potential arbs, good indicators of the right kind of contributions outside noticeboard activity, would be: A: discussions on the talkpages of articles which ARE subject to ArbCom sanctions B: discussions on the talkpages of articles NOT subject to ArbCom restrictions C: sending talkpage notifications e.g. with Twinkle, sticking to formal language D: sending talkpage notifications manually, and explaining with informal English E: working on policies/guidelines F: working on essays/helpdocs G: working on GA/FA/DYK/similar content H: working on copyedits/infoboxes/pictures/similar content I: working on categorization e.g. with HotCat J: working on autofixes e.g. with AWB or REFILL K: working with other Wikipedians via wikiprojects e.g. with MILHIST L: working with other Wikipedians via IRC e.g. with #wikipedia-en-help connect or informally M: working with other Wikipedians via email e.g. with UTRS or informally N: working with other Wikipedians in person e.g. at edit-a-thons / Wikipedian-in-residence / Wikimania / etc O: other types of contribution, please specify in your comments Please specify a comma-separated list of the types of contributions you see as positive indicators for arb-candidates to have. Your List-Of-Letters Answer: Your Comments: Q#10. Arbs who make many well-informed comments at these noticeboards (please specify which!) have the right kind of background, or experience, for ArbCom. Options: A: AE, B: arbCases, C: LTA, D: OTRS, E: AN, continued: F: OS/REVDEL, G: CU/SPI, H: AN/I, I: pageprot, J: NAC, continued: K: RfC, L: RM, M: DRN, N: EA, O: 3o, continued: P: NPOVN, Q: BLPN, R: RSN, S: NORN, T: FTN, continued: U: teahouse, V: helpdesk, W: AfC, X: NPP, Y: AfD, continued: 1: UAA, 2: COIN, 3: antiSpam, 4: AIV, 5: 3RR, continued: 6: CCI, 7: NFCC, 8: abusefilter, 9: BAG, 0: VPT, continued: Z: Other_noticeboard_not_listed_here_please_wikilink_your_answer Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as important background-experience for arb-candidates to have. Your List-Of-Letters Answer: Your Comments: Q#11. Arbs who make many comments at these noticeboards (please specify!) have the wrong kind of temperament, or personality, for ArbCom. Options: (same as previous question -- please see above) Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as worrisome personality-indicators for arb-candidates to have. Your List-Of-Letters Answer: Your Comments: Q#12. Anything else we ought to know? Your Custom-Designed Question(s): Your Custom-Designed Answer(s): The Extended-Answers End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion. Your Wikipedia Username: General Comments:

Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).

how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes

If you wish to answer via usertalk, go ahead and fill in the blanks by editing this subsection. Once you have completed the usertalk-based exit poll answers, , leave a short usertalk note, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published. If you wish to answer via email, create a new email to the Signpost column-editor by clicking Special:EmailUser/GamerPro64, and then paste the *plaintext* of the questions therein. Once you have completed the email-based exit poll answers, , leave a short usertalk note specifying the *time* you sent the email, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published (not stuck in the spam-folder). Processing of responses will be performed in batches of ten, prior to publication in the Signpost. GamerPro64 will be processing the email-based answers, and will strive to maintain the privacy of your answers (as well as your email address and the associated IP address typically found in the email-headers), though of course as a volunteer effort, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will have a system free from computer virii, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will resist hypothetical bribes offered by the KGB/NSA/MI6 to reveal your secrets, and we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will make no mistakes. If you choose to answer on-wiki, your answers will be visible to other Wikipedians. If you choose to answer via email, your answers will be sent unencrypted over the internet, and we will do our best to protect your privacy, but unencrypted email is inherently an improper mechanism for doing so. Sorry!  :-)

We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 75.108.94.227, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 14:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

renaming Anti-corruption campaign in China

hi. please see the discussion here. just want to get a bit more consensus before changing name. Happy monsoon day 21:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you so much, my friend! Same to you and your family! David Cannon (talk) 10:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Japan foreign marriage

An article that you have been involved in editing—Japan foreign marriage —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 78.148.77.86 (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Request an RfA nomination

Hi, Davidcannon! I've moved you to the "inactive" section at Wikipedia:Request an RfA nomination because you don't seem to have been that active recently. Feel free to move yourself back at any time. APerson (talk!) 17:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Davidcannon/Incubator1

User:Davidcannon/Incubator1, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davidcannon/Incubator1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Davidcannon/Incubator1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Cannonfamily300.jpg

This file, which was tagged with copy to commons (I transferred it to Commons about a month ago) has been nominated for deletion on Wikimedia Commons. Please give your input on this discussion. MB298 (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Datok Keramat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Datok Keramat. Since you had some involvement with the Datok Keramat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Eddé.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eddé.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

asking ... MOS says no

From your (now old) edit to fix links - WP:NOTBROKEN

plus, for me, the hyphen endash thing, from within a cite web template, the output is the same, so there is no need to do the fix, the output is endash in both cases
I had a link to something about not fixing something that is not broken but it might have been a bot help page Dave Rave (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Davidcannon. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks! I'll do that! David Cannon (talk) 08:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Davidcannon.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Davidcannon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Davidcannon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Adminship Nomination Request

Hello Davidcannon! I would like to request that you put consider nominating me for Wikipedia adminship. I have extension training in the field of musical theatre and stage acting, and my goal is to fill Wikipedia with additional articles about actors, musicals, stage directios, and more. Please consider nominating me. Thank you! (MonroeHarless (talk) 13:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

Nomination of Billy Koh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billy Koh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Koh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aisea Taoka

The article Aisea Taoka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Utterly NN civil servant without any references. The one "references" is a link to the home page of a newspaper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 23:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabriel Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Sharma, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. coffeecup89 (talk) 10:00, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Constitution and Politics of Fiji

Template:Constitution and Politics of Fiji has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

2bmoto

Back in November 2015 you made this edit where you substituted a url in a reference while doing cleanup. I was hoping you might comment on the edit. --Ronz (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Davidcannon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Pál Hermann

Hi Davidcannon. I ask you for help because Kleuske for some reason keeps insisting to move English and Dutch pages to Paul Hermann. My grandfather's used Pál Hermann for his music compositions, although he also used Paul when performing as a cellist. As all that is left of him are his compositions, IMSLP and German/French/Hungarian wiki pages have accepted Pál, I would like to undo Kleuske moving of the English and Dutch wiki pages to Paul, but she refuses (see her talk page). Also there was another composer Paul Hermann (1904-1970) active in Berlin, which is what the Italian, French and German Pál Hermann wiki pages explain as disambiguation. As cruel destiny will have it, this namesake of my grandfather was a Nazi composer.

My attempts to insert a similar disambituatio in the English and Dutch wiki pages have been boycotted by Kleuske as well. The sources of the name Pál Hermann are my grandfather's birthcertificate, the manuscripts of his music compositions as made accessible through IMSLP and also the recent scholarship in LA in his name and the publicity cellist Clive Greensmith gives to Hermann's cello concerto.

Could you help out? Many thanks and greetings from Italy, Pvangastel. —Preceding undated comment added 08:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Always glad to see you

Hey friend, I am always glad to see you around here. You are among my very first friends in Wikipedia. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charlesmalik.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charlesmalik.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charlesmalik.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charlesmalik.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevueli Bulamainaivalu

The article Kevueli Bulamainaivalu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rajendra Chaudhry

The article Rajendra Chaudhry has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 19:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Taininbeka

The article Taininbeka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any reliable sources that give any information about this atoll, or even verify its existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natureium (talk) 23:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Davidcannon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Davidcannon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dixon Seeto

The article Dixon Seeto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - lacking significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019!

The article You Created Kamlesh Arya, That needed for improvement. So Change into Draft Space. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxr (talk • contribs) 23:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johnson Philip

The article Johnson Philip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability that meets WP:PROF and a writer primarily known for vanity published works fails WP:AUTHOR. Most references are self-published WP:SPS by the subject of the article or reference unreliable sources such as the BrethrenPedia and Creation Science Hall of Fame. No significant coverage in secondary sources that meet WP:RS. The institutions founded are all redlinks, ie. they fail to meet WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mikeu ^talk 11:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:21, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Davidcannon,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Naidu

The article Richard Naidu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

"Arabic Langauge" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arabic Langauge. Since you had some involvement with the Arabic Langauge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Politicians from Nairai

A tag has been placed on Category:Politicians from Nairai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Rajendra Chaudhry

Do you know why this article was deleted? I remember Rajendra Chaudhary himself removing stuff from the article in regards to allegations and i reverted him a few times then and somehow he managed to get his article deleted on wikipedia...exactly what people like him don't want, articles about their treacherous acts and past, can you review it and maybe fix and restore it?, he does not fail notability so it should never have been deleted in the fist place...p.s this is cometstyles..--27.123.139.42 (talk) 01:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

As Davidcannon isn't often here, I'm taking the liberty of answering your question myself. The article was tagged for deletion in 2018 as an unsourced biography of a living person. If anyone had added even a single source during the seven days that the article was tagged, it would not have been deleted, but apparently no one cared or could find a suitable source. You can see the policy at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people, and note there is a path to have the article restored if you are willing to find sources for it. Looking through deleted revisions, it looks like anon edits (apart from some very early ones) were all reverted by a range of editors.-gadfium 04:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, this has just come to my attention. There are several issues here.

• The first is that the article, which I largely authored, has been deleted. It's not the first of "my" articles to be deleted, and it won't be the last. No big deal.
• The second is that you allege that RC himself tried to "spin" the article. I'd be curious to know how you knew it was him. Your failure to identify yourself makes it incongruous that you'd call him out as someone you SAY doctored the article, without providing any evidence that it was him, and without manning-up and identifying yourself.
• When I first wrote the article, I did not know Rajendra Chaudhry. Since then, I've had a lot to do with him and have come to consider him a friend. As a friend, it would be inappropriate for me to intervene in this dispute, as I have too much of a connection with him to be neutral. Hopefully someone with a neutral pair of eyes can be of assistance here. David Cannon (talk) 07:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Speaker query

Hello David. I saw you were still occasionally active here, so thought you might be able to help as an expert on all things Fijian! I have a query about who was the second MP for Namosi Fijian Provincial (alongside Ifereimi Buaserau) from 1992 to 1994. According to the Fiji Elections website (which I think may be run by Girmitya?), it was Apenisa Kurisaqila. However, Kurisaqila was elected Speaker of the House shortly after the elections, and according to the 1990 constitution, the Speaker had to be elected from outside the membership of the House.

Looking at the available records of debates, I cannot see any reference to a second MP from Namosi Provincial, which makes me wonder whether Kurisaqila was indeed the second MP, somehow against the rules? Number 57 22:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Seven Sister States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Seven Sister States has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Non-nationals associated with the Pitcairn Islands has been nominated for deletion

Category:Non-nationals associated with the Pitcairn Islands has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Military unrest following the 2000 Fijian coup d'état for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Military unrest following the 2000 Fijian coup d'état is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military unrest following the 2000 Fijian coup d'état until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GA-RT-22 (talk) 05:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi David. Is there any chance for this article to be referenced? I would ideally like to see it saved. Geschichte (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aftermath of the 2000 Fijian coup d'état

The article Aftermath of the 2000 Fijian coup d'état has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, not notable apart from 2000 Fijian coup d'état

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GA-RT-22 (talk) 17:19, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Index of Lebanon-related articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Index of Lebanon-related articles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Lebanon-related articles (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Grand Coalition for Fiji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Coalition for Fiji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Coalition for Fiji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 11:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marshallese emigrants to Tuvalu

A tag has been placed on Category:Marshallese emigrants to Tuvalu indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tuvaluan people of Marshallese descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Tuvaluan people of Marshallese descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marcel (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcelle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:Attorneys General of Fiji has been nominated for renaming

Category:Attorneys General of Fiji has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Welsh expatriates in Fiji

A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh expatriates in Fiji indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Welsh expatriates in Kenya

A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh expatriates in Kenya indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Welsh expatriates in Singapore

A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh expatriates in Singapore indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rodney Acraman

The article Rodney Acraman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Davidcannon a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Udall" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Udall and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 13 § Udall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JMWt (talk) 16:35, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

I believe I have made more than 100 edits over the past YEAR. Not just the last five years. I made a flurry of edits related to the general election in the Philippines in 2022. David Cannon (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amy Chambers

The article Amy Chambers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IdiotSavant (talk) 05:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elenoa Mara-Rasova

The article Elenoa Mara-Rasova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IdiotSavant (talk) 22:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samuela Matakibau

The article Samuela Matakibau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is currently completely unsourced (although it had sources at creation). It mostly consists of WP:BLPCRIME material and a quick BEFORE hasn't indicated independant notability (at least with what I've been able to find online in English).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

BLP deletions

Hi,

A few articles created by you have had to be deleted as BLP violations. Specifically, I personally deleted Samuela Matakibau as a G10 and Laisa Digitaki as a summary deletion per WP:BLPDEL. It seems like there might be more of these that have been unsourced for years and contentious. Would you be willing to help look through you article creations to see if there are any others? The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

BLP noticeboard discussion

Hi, I've started a BLP noticeboard discussion about your biographies here. Feel free to participate. It seems like you aren't very active, which is part of the reason I chose this route. I was hoping that if there's any further issues more eyes would be helpful. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Nuanced voices on the Reconciliation, Tolerance, and Unity Bill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuanced voices on the Reconciliation, Tolerance, and Unity Bill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuanced voices on the Reconciliation, Tolerance, and Unity Bill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 04:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nemia Vainitoba

The article Nemia Vainitoba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IdiotSavant (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben Padarath for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Padarath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Padarath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Willem Ouweneel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willem Ouweneel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willem Ouweneel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dutch Charismatics

A tag has been placed on Category:Dutch Charismatics indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dutch Plymouth Brethren

A tag has been placed on Category:Dutch Plymouth Brethren indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joana Rokomatu

The article Joana Rokomatu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable; fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IdiotSavant (talk) 05:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elenoa Vavaitamana

The article Elenoa Vavaitamana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable; fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IdiotSavant (talk) 04:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fijian people of French descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Fijian people of French descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swedish emigrants to Fiji

A tag has been placed on Category:Swedish emigrants to Fiji indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Rainbow.jpg

Greetings,

currently File:Rainbow.jpg is mainly used in your userspace. Which version is supposed to display there? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scottish emigrants to Fiji

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish emigrants to Fiji indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wallis and Futuna emigrants

A tag has been placed on Category:Wallis and Futuna emigrants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion

Dear David, thank you for your invitation on Quora. I can see that we have more in common than just Quora: Esperanto, interest in Pacific Islands, Korea, Wikipedia, and real sense of Christianity. Therefore I wanted to know who you are by your political sympathies, and I have realised that the link in your user page you had given to the Political Compass has since then become obsolete, in fact long ago. If you want to keep it maybe it would be good to repace it with the link to the Internet Archive copy of 2006, seemingly the last year the site was active. I admire your work on Fiji, I have browsed through some of those articles, and I only wonder, how come that someone so interested in Fiji and so interested in languages has not learnt any Fijian language? Best, noychoH (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Category:Foreign Ministers of X

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Category:Foreign Ministers of X on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Davidcannon. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sugar City Ratepayers Alliance

The article Sugar City Ratepayers Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't find a reputable record of this hyper-local political group

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Würzburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Social Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Thank you! David Cannon (talk) 07:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Embassy of Fiji, Brussels

The article Embassy of Fiji, Brussels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No inline sources. Basically a list of staff. Fails WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lakeside Church

The article Lakeside Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No inherent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Embassy of Fiji, Brussels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Fiji, Brussels, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Fiji, Brussels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Open Brethren churches in Canada

A tag has been placed on Category:Open Brethren churches in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 00:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)