User talk:Faradn
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 05:51, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
re: "Don't use Unicode!"
[edit]It's not Unicode, it's HTML entities... they should show up in all browsers, unless I'm mistaken. What's SOP for educating quotes at Wikipedia? Or is SOP that all single and double quotes must remain ugly and stink of unprofessionalism? No offense meant. Also, is there a more convenient forum for discussions of this sort?
-- 160.39.193.101 05:35, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Try metawikipedia. Personally, I don't see how uneducated quotes are ugly- it's a matter of taste and convenience. Articles with educated quotes are much harder to edit than those without, and we should leave them that way. If you want to embark on a project to educate Wikipedia's quotes, you'd better first consult with others. --Faradn
I think you were mistaken to change "[0,1)" to "(0,1)" in Cantor's diagonal argument. [0,1), with one square bracket on the left and one round bracket on the right, is a half-open interval; (0,1), with two round brackets, is an open interval. The former makes sense in context; the latter does not. Michael Hardy 02:51, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Sorry! I'm not really a math guru- it just seemed like a typo to me. Thanks for clearing that up. --Faradn 03:14, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]For the Capitalization :) that I unintentionally lost when reverting. --Humus sapiens 08:14, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)