Talk:2003 in politics

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Fonzy, I guess you're taking this information from [1]. They state that Data from this site may be queried and copied on a not-for-profit basis only if the source is accurately credited. Shouldn't this be done on this page? D.D. 21:24 Jan 11, 2003 (UTC)

hmm yes I am, but i am trying to re-word things but i am nto very good at re-wording things, i prefer wikipedia to have its own data re-ritten, created. But for now yes i suppose qouting teh main source is ok. -fonzy

I deleted Information on this page is used with permission from Rulers; but please add more information even slighty reword to each point if you can. These are facts, nothing here is copyrightable. -- Zoe

Also, making use of non-for-profit licence would convert wikipedia into a non-for-profit publication, which is not the same as GFDL.

Not sure where else to put this ...

In General

2003 will be remembered by future historians as the year the pretense of democracy in the United States ended. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]

--Jerrod Day

That's not NPOV and therefore does not belong.--Jiang | Talk 02:37, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for the explaination and pointer. I'll study later on NPOV's discomfort with factual matters of evidence; or perhaps the discomfort is with the derived conclusion rather than the evidence.