Talk:Copyright Term Extension Act

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Copyright Term Extension Act article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

Open Access Mid‑importance

Copyright Term Extension Act is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abbymaz, Emmakay88, Zpayne2689, Donovanh10, Dfitch98, Alexisderosa1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Term Extension Act → Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act – According to the public law pdf and txt (etc), "Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act" is the only official short title for the act. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page seems already at the correct title. Randy Kryn (talk) 08:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unclear in what way you mean that, Randy. Could you elaborate? My proposition is that since "Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act" is the actual short name of the act, and "Copyright Term Extension Act" is just a nickname, we should move the page to the actual name. Note: you've caused me to noticed that I made an error in copying down the proposed new name; I have corrected it now to "Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act". Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dingolover6969 (talk • contribs) 19:10, January 12, 2022 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The WP:COMMONNAME is "Copyright Term Extension Act". While "Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act" does appear to be the only official short title for the act, the official name does not control. TJRC (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The "actual" name of the act doesn't control per WP:OFFICIALNAME (although is a fine redirect, of couse). See Commission on the Naming of Items of the Department of Defense that Commemorate the Confederate States of America or Any Person Who Served Voluntarily with the Confederate States of America for example which is not actually at the title I linked. SnowFire (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you for your commentary. Let me clarify my position: based on my own general impression of literature in the area, I believe "Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act" is the most common name used for this act. The shorter nickname "Copyright Term Extension Act" is a close second, and used by many reputable sources as well, perhaps to an equal extent. I have just done a quick Google search of "copyright term extension act" and in news articles etc it seems to be referred to as the "Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act" more often than not-- although this is an informal survey of course. As the two terms are both used extensively and commonly, I thought the officialness of the one name might serve as a tiebreaker between them. Although, this is definitely a trade-off between precision and concision, in my view. I don't feel very strongly about this issue, as they are both good names for an article. Dingolover6969 (talk) 23:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Because Bono is so heavily associated with the act, it is indeed possible for the proposed title to be the common name, but it's near-impossible to prove. O.N.R. ^(talk) 00:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per the others. lethargilistic (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

500juta kembalikan uang saya sekarang

Nomor rekening 0895323945034 bank dana Saya atas nama Riko ARI Wibowo kembalian tolong di bantu saya ganggu orang lain ingin memiliki uang saya sekarang 36.69.113.6 (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Copyright' v. 'Copyrights'

This article seems to inconsistently use the two words. Though the Act obviously uses the singular, both the the plural and singular are sometimes used to refer to the legal concept itself. For example:

"Following the Copyright Act of 1976, copyright would last for the life of the author plus 50 years"

As opposed to:

"In 2003, the plaintiffs in the Eldred case began to shift their effort toward the U.S. Congress in support of a bill called the Public Domain Enhancement Act that would make the provisions of the Bono Act apply only to copyrights that had been registered with the Library of Congress".

Can't find any firm consistency in the sources or on other pages. Someone who knows more than me can make an edit if needed. HomeAliveIn45 (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]