Talk:Independence of psychohistory
This needs serious work to be made NPOV; as it stands it is shamelessly partisan. It contains at least one glaring error: note the statement, "...the opinions of historians and anthropologists on psychohistorical matters should have no more weight than the opinion of an experimental physicist should have on theoretical physics; none whatsoever." In actual fact, the findings of experimental physics are the basis against which all theory must be tested. If an experimental physicist has reason to believe that something in theoretical physics is contrary to the evidence, then his opinion is most certainly relevant. -- April 11:59 Aug 1, 2002 (PDT)
Why is this page separate to the Psychohistory page? It would make more sense as a section within the Psychohistory page which would then allow that page more balanced when the views of Historians sceptical of Psychohistory are recorded there. Lumos3 23:54, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Independence of psychohistory page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Independence of psychohistory" page.
