Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinnie Richards
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 16:22, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Same case as Hans Nusslein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayumashu (talk • contribs) 04:51, 26 May 2005
- I've just written an article about Vinnie Richards. So there's no reason to delete it. If I have the strength of character, maybe I'll also do a brief one about Hans Nusslien. Hayford Peirce 18:04, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Agree, keep, definitely encyclopaedic. Noel (talk) 05:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This whole Wikipedia bit about redirects etc. can be very confusing. What I *want* to say is this: keep the link between Vinnie and the Pro Championship listings. Do *not* delete the link or the Hans article. Hayford Peirce 06:01, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Step three of the notification process was not completed. I am fixing the fomatting and completing the nomination. No vote implied. RJFJR 03:21, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Should be self-explanatory why.The Literate Engineer 03:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like a relic of the crusade against the tennis redirects... -- Jonel | Speak 03:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, and I do believe that this nomination is partially my fault - I bugged the guy about leaving some {{rfd}} tags lying around. humblefool® 20:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand.--Poli 03:34, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.