User talk:Numberonedad

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

10qwerty 18:21, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have got to add more information to an article beyond "such-and-such is a song by R.E.M." It's leaving a lot of work for others to fix. Thanks. - 67.52.188.182 16:42, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's all the information I have. Are you going to redirect all of the songs? A category for R.E.M. songs has all ready been posted. --Numberonedad 16:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then please do a little bit of research online to find out more. Keep the end user in mind. Who wrote the song? Did it chart? Is it based on another melody? Are there any technical tricks that make it stand out? There's a ton of info just waiting on Google. - 67.52.188.182 16:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that like stealing? If you get something off of the internet it's like your taking the site's information and putting it on Wikipedia. If your sure I will try and find some more information but I don't want to get into trouble. --Numberonedad 16:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes and no. A direct cut-and-paste is a violation of copyright law. Definite no-no. However, using the information from other sources and putting it in your own words is perfectly acceptable. I think I see the problem here. If you're afraid of violating copyright law, don't be. Just make sure it's in your own words is all. Good luck. - 67.52.188.182 18:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Your question about categories is answered here. A good guideline is to ask "would this article be useful to someone curious about this topic?" -Wiccan Quagga 01:13, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think you both forgot to mention citing your sources. If you take something from the Internet, even if you put it into your own words, you should still cite the sources that you used. --65.8.4.15 (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Numberonedad! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jeffrey Jey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Jey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Jey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Jey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EditorE (talk) 03:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]