Talk:Jeromy Carriere
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jeromy Carriere)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
From VfD:
Resume of a software developer. Kbh3rd 00:58, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- the bulk of the text seems to be about quacking. Delete.--Ianb 06:14, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- If this Quack.com is an interesting example of a dotcom startup and how they faired, then perhaps it should have an article. But unless the founders and executives have done more of note in their own right, they shouldn't have an article. Delete, no redirect. Average Earthman 09:01, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- You can create a series of articles on an interesting example of a dotcom startup if you keep deleting the articles while still in the beginning stages of creation. This article was around for 59 minutes before being listed here. anthony (see warning) 15:34, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Co-founder of a company worth more than VA Software when it was bought out. anthony (see warning) 15:31, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with Average Earthmen. Andris 20:07, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)
- Agree with rationale, but not vote (precisely), of Average Earthman. Quack.com seems to be notable (it's the subject of some business case studies at Harvard), so move and cleanup. — Gwalla | Talk 06:09, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup. Seems slightly notable. Rhymeless 03:36, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Agree with the keepers.--Dittaeva 16:13, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
responsible use of tags
[edit]I see no explanation here for the notability tag. The guy earned prestigious awards and an honorary doctorate, I think the notability tag is frivolous. If no one defends it, after a reasonable period of time, I suggest it be removed. Geo Swan (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)